Sci>scie>esci>scopus

I think both of them. )

Hi David, I think their is a misunderstanding in your question. ESCI and SCOPUS are indexes. They don't publish articles. They index journals in which articles are published. SCOPUS is highly selective and applies strict criteria. ESCI is less so. If you read the Factsheet here [ http://wokinfo.com/media/pdf/ESCI_Fact_Sheet.pdf ] you can see they apply less rigorous criteria in emerging and regional journals. My strong advice would be to go to the Curtin University Library [ https://library.curtin.edu.au/ ] and talk to your librarian about publishing options. They know a lot! BW Matt

I agree with Matt!

Both ESCI or Scopus are good. But it will be better if you publish your research in SCI journals only.

Both are good But SCI is The Best for Research Publications

Both ESCI or Scopus are good and active if we publish our researchs in SCI journals only.

Both are equally good.

Why people do recommend SCI? What are the advantages and disadvantages of publishing in SCI or ESCI?

I agree with matt

Both are equally good but it depends on the individual as which indexing suits him/her the most. However, I personally feel that even Google Scholar is good too and I prefer to use this.

Both are fine. It depends which indexing is more recommended by your university. As far as I know, one main difference is that almost all the ESCI journals are listed in ISI Master List whereas this in not the case for Scopus.

Both are fine. But better to publish in SCI index journal to get recognition and acceptance among researchers.

I believe both are good and thus, SCOPUS indexed journals have more than ESCI index journal.

SCI index is better than Scopus

SCI index is better compared to scopus.

Both of SCI and Scopus are very good. But Scopus is better one.

Regards.

Both are good. Just go and publish in journals indexed by them.

Both are very good journal index.

they use a similair score: citescore for scopus and impact factor for web of science

Scopus is better for social science

ESCI is published by Clarivate Analytics, and indicates the possibility of a future listing in SCIE or SSCI.

Scopus provides what is, in effect, a 3-year impact factor, as distinct from SCIE and SCCI, both of which publish 2-year and 5-year impact factors.

Scopus dominates ESCI, but there is no clear dominance between Scopus, on the one hand, and SCIE and SSCI, on the other.

ESCI>SCOPUS

Sci>scie>esci>scopus

Scopus is better then ESCI, here ESCI means emerging source citation index not science citation index. But in case of sci-scie-scopus, here sci means science citation index..

Well, as I said before, it is upto the authors to decide. For e.g. I prefer Google citations better than any other as they do not discriminate the publishers of the journal

SCIE>ESCI>SCOPUS in general.

There are many good journals in Scopus, but being in Scopus doesn't mean that a journal is good. But very good journals won't be in ESCI, but very low-quality journals won't be in it either.

Both SCIE and SSCI provide 2-year and 5-year impact factors.

SCIE and SSCI cannot be compared as they are for different groups of disciplines.

SCIE does not have an impact factor.

Scopus provides CiteScore, which is a 3-year impact factor.

The WofS created SSCI/SCI in 1964. It is managed by Thompson Reuters/Clariviate. A journal has to apply to get SSCI recognition/accreditation so it takes time to get recognition as you have to provide evidence the journal is used in academic debates and works published there are being cited in other journals. The Emerging index is to show that the journal is on its way to getting full SSCI, and when done will establish the journal Impact Factor. JIF varies by discipline but a JIF over 1.0 in management/business is really really good. In research intensive unis, The JIF has more kudos as often associated with an established journal. WofS access is not free and unis have to pay for services. Scopus owned by Elselvier was introduced in 2004 and established a journal ranking system called citescore, but the q1-q4 is often used. Scopus rankings are free which is the reason many universities are saying faculty should publish in journals listed in scopus. My approach is always to look at journal home page, publisher, aims and scope and editorial team (which often has JIF on main journal page), and also says scopus indexed. You can search schimago for Q1-Q4 info, but this does not list all information needed to guide your decision making processes. Unis have preferences for certain journals and certain publisher's. For example, sage and wiley journals are generally more respected than emerald. However, the gameplan all changing with OA which provides quicker route to publishing, via article processing fee, and this charge is being picked up by many unis but not all.

Springer publishes Nature and all of its associated journals.

I agree with Mohit Bajaj

I agree with Mohit Bajaj

Yes Springer good publisher. WofS and Scopus rank journals. But best to go to journal website...the publisher is important, as some publishers more favourably viewed.

There are many good publishers, and the Open Access model is becoming increasingly popular, even for traditional hard copy journals.

ESCI Journals are open access, peer reviewed, international scientific journals. The portfolio of journals spans all areas of scientific research. ESCI Journals Publishing is an Open Access Publication model enabling the dissemination of research articles to the global community. The Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) was launched in late 2015 by Thomson Reuters as a new database in Web of Science. SCOPUS is a well-known indexing/ranking database of Elsevier. It is reputed as the largest of all such platforms. ESCI is a "feeder" index to the SCIE/SSCI/AHCI, which in turn feed into SCI. If you search the ESCI, you'll find that the most prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters aren't actually indexed here. Scopus is fundamentally different and is built more on inclusiveness than quality.

I agree with mohit bajaj

Not all journals listed in ESCI are Open Access.

Yes Joshua as this is free. In UK WofS, research intensive unis with strong STEM prefer WofS. But OA getting respect. Some great OA journals, some poor.

Maurice not all ESCI are OA. This is like accreditation step 1 before full SSCI. Many top publishers developing OA, but still state of flux with pure OA like publisher MDPI. First call for journal decision home page, publisher, editorial team. In UK emerald not considered academic publisher

I'm going to get an academic agent or influencer. Need advice for my web capital

Not all ESCI journals are open access.

I can see an echo effect.

SCI or SCIE is far better than SCOPUS

the both are good. Scopus has the citescore and SCI has the impact factor

CiteScore is a 3-year impact factor.

Hi,

Mohit Bajaj is spot on.