@Hossein Javadi

"In modern physics, a charged particle creates an electric field itself, but the mechanism of this process is ambiguous and does not explain how a charged particle creates an electric field?

A charged particle does not create an electric field, it is endowed with an electric field.

"when intensity of gravitational field increases or interfere gravitational fields of two massive bodies that are moving adjacent each other, gravity produces the electromagnetic energy."

I thought that movement of masses generates gravitational waves. Why electromagnetic (e.m.) waves? E.m. waves are produced by accelerated movement of charged particles.

"According to the quantum mechanics that photon and electron are unstructured particle, we cannot describe the mechanism of absorption and emission photon by electron that is logically unacceptable."

What is the connection with the non-structurality of the photon and electron? When a charged particle accelerates it is the difference in the energy of its center-of-mass movement that transforms into e.m. field, the internal structure of the electron doesn't change.

Dear Hossein,

Actually we cannot go beyond the Standard Model unless we go beyond electromagnetic theory.

All modern Physics is an application and a variation of EM theories.

Working Paper Beyond Electromagnetic Theory

Hello Doctor is a wonderful question and apologized for the answer is not within my specialty Greetings

It is the Copenhagen representation that Physical Theory should be developed from things that can be tested and measured. Einstein preferred hidden variables, but largely lost the argument. This topic could be argued again if my concept prevails of physical laws contained in vacuum space microstates.

Dear Sofia

Before pair production, we have a photon and after pair production, we have two fermions (electron and positron) in which each of them have their own electric fields.

After pair decay, their electric fields are disappeared along with electron and positron. Therefore, it must be generalized the method of production and physical properties of fields from fermions to the structure of photon and vice versa.

Also with such an approach, we can recognize the mechanism of electromagnetic interactions, use it to explain strong and weak interactions, and take a step towards to unify forces.

You wrote: "E.m. waves are produced by accelerated movement of charged particles." Yes, it is a way, but quantum vacuum is other way.

Dear Demetris

Thank you for interesting article. In my opinion, we can go beyond the Standard model by unifying quantum vacuum and electromagnetism.

Dear Jerry

Thank you for interesting mention. Perhaps, vacuum space microstates or sub quantum scale is two name for a matter.

Thanks for invitation, I think it is related to undiscovered or under investigation energies or the so called renewable energies.

Emad

Thanks for sharing the question. I couldn't agree more with Dear Demetris. I feel we are not ready to proceed further with an effective next step yet. Time will show if and how our boundaries are extended.

Regards

Dear Emad

Thank you for comment, it is related to structure of photon and other particles.

Dear Aristidis

You wrote: "Time will show if and how our boundaries are extended." Thank you for comment, I agree with you.

The need for a reliable far space travelling will force us to escape from 'EM trap', otherwise, provided that a whole set of careers has been established in 'orthodox view', not even a single step forward will be done. 

Dear Demetris

Maybe, I need to review your article carefully. It takes time.

I will reply my opinion.

Regards

Hossein

Yes sub quantum scale is the reason we must use indirect measure. In quantum action a probability occurs then a measurement is done. Repeated measurements always average to the classical law. So we should conclude that the classical law is present in every quantum action, but only in part, since it is distributed over enough micro space that a single event does not engage the complete law. Then there is enough data in libraries to compute properties of the sub quantum scale by evaluating how the approach to classical law progresses as the measurements accumulate.

Dear Jerry

I agree with you, in addition as we know; “A photon-like wave-packet based on novel solutions of Maxwell’s equations is proposed. It is believed to be the first ‘classical’ model that contains so many of the accepted quantum features”.

https://arxiv.org/ftp/quant-ph/papers/0609/0609156.pdf

So, to understand concept and properties of photon, we need to start with classical conceptions of electromagnetic radiation.

With the amazing advent of quantum mechanics, still classic patterns are used in the design of quantum computers.

http://ein.iconnect007.com/index.php/article/105177/classical-mechanics-helps-control-quantum-computers/105180/?skin=ein

Because our mind can well analyze classical phenomena, but the classic and quantum phenomena follow the same rules. In addition, the classical and quantum classification of physical phenomena is a human approach.

Hi!

I come across some interesting links, check if they provide some useful information.

Understanding the hidden dimensions of modern physics through the arts

(http://theconversation.com/understanding-the-hidden-dimensions-of-modern-physics-through-the-arts-45966)

Adaptive Review of Three Fundamental Questions in Physics

(http://vbn.aau.dk/en/publications/adaptive-review-of-three-fundamental-questions-in-physics(56856485-f643-4b95-a18d-3fb9f5cdaafb)/export.html)

Heisenberg (and Schrödinger, and Pauli) on Hidden Variables

(https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00992725/file/C12.pdf)

Exotic insulator may hold clue to key mystery of modern physics

Research shows material living between classical and quantum worlds

(https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/12/161202150853.htm)

The Hidden Measurement Formalism: What Can Be Explained and Where Quantum Paradoxes Remain

(https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1023%2FA%3A1026670802579.pdf)

Have a look at Gerard t Hooft's book:

http://www.springer.com/us/book/9783319412849

It might be the best (or even the only?)  resource to understand 'hidden' parts of physics...

Best Regards

Andreas

Dear Andreas

Thank you for link and bringing up the book. This book has propounded a quantum mechanics as a tool not a basic way to solve physics problems. I my opinion, we need a new approach on fundamental laws of modern physics that I have propounded in my book.

Beyond the Standard Model : Modern physics problems and solutions

https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/1939123623