my dear unique scholars comment on this question. this question taken from my research provided in link.
Special theory of relativity clearly says, ‘a force which is identified as electrostatic in one frame of reference is observed as a magnetic force in another frame.
If it is magnetic force in another frame means, I assume the charge should be magnetic in that frame. By this assumption I construct theory of having magnetic monopole.
based on this logic, i frame one postulate:
“Assume an electron is magnetic monopole as a result of Special theory of relativity!”
result:
The result of this postulate removes conflict. There are two conflicting units in use for magnetic charge [Qm] Webers [Wb] and ampere-meters [A-m]. In this theory I remove this conflict by showing magnetic charge will be measured in Webers (Wb).
Article Magnetic Monopole Theory
What's wrong is that the starting statement is wrong, because special relativity doesn't imply the relation claimed. How electric and magnetic fields transform under Lorentz transformations is described in any undergraduate course in electromagnetism, so there's no point trying to guess it. Cf. for instance: http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_26.html
Volume II is background knowledge for understanding what magnetic monopoles could be-cf. Coleman's lecture on the subject: https://inspirehep.net/record/179498/
There isn't any conflict at all. Units describe conventions and many units can describe the same quantity.
@Stam Nicolis
did you mean that, Weber and ampere-meter both are equal?
what i know is, units does not describe conventions and many units cannot describe the same quantity.
if many units can describe the same quantity; describe 'mass', 'energy', 'length', 'time', 'current', etc... with many units. if you want please use conventions also.
thank you.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Physical Sciences
- Electromagnetics
- Electromagnetic Fields