You're talking about replacing Mn³⁺ (67 pm) with Co³⁺ (65 pm) in a perovskite structure like LaMnO₃ or similar. Since both are in the +3 oxidation state, this is an isovalent substitution, but the ionic radius difference will have several important consequences.
Structural Effects: The smaller ionic radius of Co³⁺ causes slight lattice contraction and increased octahedral tilting, leading to structural distortion from ideal symmetry (e.g., cubic to orthorhombic).
Magnetic Properties: Co³⁺ can exist in multiple spin states (low, intermediate, or high spin). If it adopts a low-spin state (S = 0), magnetic ordering weakens significantly compared to the high-spin Mn³⁺ (S = 2). This alters superexchange interactions and may reduce or disrupt long-range magnetic ordering.
Electronic & Transport Behavior: Differences in electronic configuration and bonding can affect charge transport, potentially changing conductivity or inducing metal–insulator transitions depending on the degree of substitution.
Overall Impact: This substitution tunes the perovskite’s structure, magnetism, and electronic properties, offering pathways to engineer materials for specific functions like magnetoresistance, spintronics, or catalysis.
Yes, in case of a perovskite material and you replacing the the magnetic ion with same oxidation number but lesser ionic radius as seen in your question text ( replacing Co^3+ ion 65pm by Mn^3+ ion 67pm) . So you have to expect the magnetic properties become improved well , since magnetism properties are usually related to unfilled 3d electron shells of transition metal ions incorporated on the bulk ion site (electronic configuration of Co^3+ ion is [Ar] 3d6 and for a Mn3+ ion is [Ar]3d4) . On other hand, the difference in ionic radius is small and it's has limmited effect on the degree of crystallographic distortions of most perovskitessize and only falls in the context of a rough estimate error of structure tolerance factor .