I gave this answer that, "theoretical relevance and empirical validation in prior peer-reviewed research. I used established and widely used scales to ensure construct validity, with particular attention to those that had demonstrated acceptable reliability coefficients (e.g., Cronbach’s alpha ≥ 0.70) and evidence of convergent and discriminant validity". But the reviewer is not satisfied. As scale is well developed and established, but the problem with one of the scale is that the original scales uses half negative worded items. I did some adaptations by dropping the negative worded items while some I retained. How i can justify at this moment.