For further explanations about this question and why it matters, look here:

Preprint Theoretical predicted approximate rest value of the eEDM ele...

Dear Riccardo C. Storti ,

"Apologies if I have completely misinterpreted your objective; my intention is to be constructive, not obstructive"

Not at all. I am pleased with your input, that is how science works.

Our charge flux fiber model for the electron is for a hypothetical isolated free electron without any translational motion, still in space spinning.

We know that this type of hypothetical idealized electron does not exist and it is not interacting with its environment but it was necessary to simplify the model, extrapolate and simulate its most fundamental intrinsic characteristics and possible intrinsic mechanics.

I will have a look on your work. Again thank you for your input although not directly related with my specific question herein.

Kind Regards,

Emmanouil

Dear Riccardo C. Storti ,

From your abstract of your very interesting paper:

"This suggests that the electron radius depends on the manner in which it is measured and the energy absorbed by the electron during the measuring process."

(3) (PDF) Derivation of fundamental particle radii: Electron, Proton, and Neutron. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/252320249_Derivation_of_fundamental_particle_radii_Electron_Proton_and_Neutron [accessed Jul 29 2022].

Article Derivation of Fundamental Particle Radii: Electron, Proton, ...

I couldn't agree more with your above conclusion. Our research also shows a similar conclusion and thank you for verifying this. The electron charge radius and charge flux manifold, changes with acceleration (and maybe also even with constant velocity) and can deform its manifold under certain conditions for example when not free but bounded in an atom or molecule, however it maintains its fine structure constant in a vacuum α~1/137 all times.

This is why we had to analyze and simulate its fundamental intrinsic mechanics and characteristics in our model by freezing the electron in translational space.

Article A ½ spin fiber model for the electron

Kind Regards,

Emmanouil

Yes, I know RG is doing probably some sporadic updates on their member profile pages.

Try latter.

Riccardo C. Storti ,

I believe it is better to continue our conversation via RG private messaging not to confuse other members who like to answer the question in this thread.

At the end of the day the electron charge manifold could be similar to the Earth. A tiny wider on the equator generating an E monopole interaction field with its environment that is not perfect spherical.

Dear Riccardo C. Storti ,

I am very pleased that our models are able to verify and link to each others!

Thank you for your analysis and effort to make this clear.

Also the results are consistent with the Nature Journal experiment reported values of the proton radius.

Please let us continue this discussion via RG private messaging since this is quite irrelevant to this question thread.

Kind Regards,

Emmanouil

Riccardo C. Storti

I have sent you a message via RG private messaging.

Riccardo C. Storti

I have sent you a new private message via RG.

Two measurements of the same thing, are not/ never equal.