Proponents argue that such updates help maintain honest scholarship by discouraging plagiarism and AI misuse. However, critics sometimes see these updates as potentially overhyped or as part of a costly arms race between detection tools and AI developers, which may not always translate into meaningful educational benefits.

The effectiveness and value of these updates depend on how institutions and educators implement and interpret them, balancing technological tools with promoting genuine learning and critical thinking.

Stephen I. Ternyik Perfectly said. However, some universities around the world are already disabling the AI check option of Turnitin because they think it is not working properly. I tested it myself many times and a content self-written was flagged as AI.

It's true that some universities are reconsidering or disabling AI detection tools like Turnitin's AI check feature because of concerns about accuracy and false positives. These tools can sometimes misidentify human-written content as AI-generated, especially when the writing style or phrasing resembles common AI outputs or when students use certain writing techniques.

If you've experienced having your own work flagged mistakenly it highlights the current limitations of AI detection technology. Many experts recommend using these tools as supplementary rather than definitive measures, emphasizing the importance of human judgment in academic integrity assessments.

For students and educators alike, it's good to stay informed about these tools' capabilities and limitations, and to focus on fostering honest, original work rather than solely relying on detection software.