I really admire his idea and great dedication

I really admire his idea and great dedication

It seems at times that the work of others is picked up verbatim by the "W-p put-together author" without reference to the original author.

The Wikipedia contributing to prepare Shortnotes on any topic. The summary, basic concept, definition, history, scope, integration of subtopics and, references can be gathered from one page. I believe, the wiki-information is sufficient to have a surficial study.

I support you in this opinion of Parisa. Wikipedia is very convenient as a magic wand.

I follow

Wikipedia gives us base knowledge on every search item given it though it needs discretion in using the many unsolicited information posted. It is a reliable informant ready to answer our call in a relatively short time.

Wikipedia is very useful , especially in issues that is not familiar for us. Thank you dear Prof Parisa, I support you 100%

I consider Wikipeda as a wonderful tertiary source of information containing info on almost anything in the world.

Agree with the answer of Barbara Sawicka...it is not always right.. authentication has to be checked..

Wikipeda Strengths

1. Wikipedia is completely free, providing access to information on millions of topics to anyone with Internet capabilities.

2. Wikipedia is constantly updated by the hour. In comparison, print encylopedias are usually updated annually.

3. Wikipedia is a great place to start your research, giving you background information on your topic and possible keywords to help you conduct more in-depth research elsewhere.

4. Sources used in the articles are cited, allowing further investigation into any topic.

https://pitt.libguides.com/wikipedia/prosandcons

Wikipeda Weaknesses

1. Anyone can create, edit, or delete Wikipedia articles.

2. Wikipedia articles cannot be considered scholarly, because we know nothing about the contributors. [Definition of Scholarly Articles]

3. Articles are works-in-progress, meaning changes are constantly occuring to the information. When an article is first published, the information might waver back and forth between viewpoints before achieving a neutral tone. Viewing the behind-the-scenes discussion can be a valuable way of learning about those varying perspectives.

4. Sometimes articles are vandalized, whether for fun, as a hoax, or because the subject is controversial.

5. The intended audience can vary-- some articles are written from a insider's view, with highly technical language, while some are written for a more general audience. This can be both frustrating and valuable depending on what one is looking for, and either way is a warning sign that the information can be inconsistent.

https://pitt.libguides.com/wikipedia/prosandcons

Wikipedia Mistakes

• 25 Biggest Blunders in Wikipedia History, See

https://www.bestcollegesonline.com/blog/2009/02/10/25-biggest-blunders-in-wikipedia-history/

Wikipedia has sometimes falsely reported the deaths of famous people (including Senator Edward Kennedy and Miley Cyrus). There have also been cases of libel or hoaxes.

https://pitt.libguides.com/wikipedia/prosandcons

Centre of basic knowledge with some worthful information

Useful for instant information, many a times coupled with i) illustrations, ii) references (sometimes with PDF file links as well). Information on this platform, may even be edited. updated. References need to be checked with references, especially in case of data. In general, good platform for quick and ready reference.

Dear Parisa Ziarati

I think Wikipedia is a wonderful source for public information. however can not be consider as an acceptable source of information for Researchers.

WIKIPEDIA is hub of knowledge and I admire, but whether all information is correct & it is useful for scientists.

We can rely on Wikipedia. It is a store house of knowledge and information on various topics. It is updated regularly.

One window operation serves to know which you do not know.

very necessary

follow

I am familiar with contributors to the Wikipedia. Each contribution counts towards "publications", a necessary step in staying as an academic.

I think it is a reliable, continuously-expanding source of knowledge available in many languages. I would love to add some information to some of the articles, too.

I think Wikipedia is great reference for more information in different fields.

Definitely Wikipedia is the mother of all references bibliographic, many people have no credibility, but there you can find excellent references, since researchers also edit writings on the page

Wikipedia is the first site I consult whenever I have a new info to look for its meaning

good greeting:

Good Sister

Implementing initial ideas and sharing them with the world online is the shortest way to convince others of the importance and power of your idea, to join it later and help you develop and enrich it. The words of Linz Trufelds, author of the Linux kernel, summarize the entire issue:

"No one should start a big project directly. You have to start a small, simple project, without expecting this project to become big. If you begin to think this way, you will design it overly and unnecessarily, and you will feel that it is far more important than its real value at that point. Or perhaps even worse, you may be afraid of the amount of work pressure needed to achieve your vision. For this start a small start, think about the details. Do not think of the big picture and the supernatural design. If your project can not solve an urgent and fairly direct need, your project must be overly designed. Do not expect people to jump and help you, things do not work! You have to build a useful thing halfway up first, and then the others will say, "Oh that's already part of my problem!" And they'll join your project "

General information as you sitting in traditional hall

Wikipedia is a perfect tool for getting into a new topic. I also like images from Wikipedia Commons.

Following.

Wikipedia is needed as a quick source of verified information that will be appropriately explained and with the necessary links to other sources of information.

It should be continually updated.

Current research should not be put on Wikipedia, but it might be interesting to add in each area a section of the key research topic or what problems are trying to be solved.

All dear friends and colleagues, Thank you for sharing your great ideas in my page!

Appreciate you all!

Best wishes

Wikipedia is the largest and most popular general reference work on the World Wide Web, and is one of the most popular websites ranked by Alexa as of June 2019. I think it is the best & easiest source to study and know about anything. When i need information about any product, basic scientific theory, machines i can find out it easily on the Wikipedia website.

Wikipedia is very helpful and important platform to get any information. However, for the research work I feel, should not rely only on it, should check other references too.

Wikipedia is a storehouse of information on various topics. Myself, I am a Ghanaian Wikipedian. Many of us have the privilege of editing text and writing articles on Wikipedia. I have some few articles there. Its a great step to knowledge in one's quest for rich information on a theme. Kind regards

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opemso_Festival

I wrote this article on an interesting cultural festival in my country.

Very valuble question.

Dear doctors,

I have a commendable work witch is important in the context of Organic Chemistry, Applied Chemistry, Medicinal Chemistry, Agricultural Chemistry, and Artificial Intelligence.(AI).

If you need this paper, you can contact me by a message.

Regards