I am an evaluator of development programmes and have good experience in Monitoring and Evaluation with national and international agencies in India.
My Ph D problem is : What is the role that evidence plays in shaping policy-making and program implementation in India, especially in the context of women's employment and skilling initiatives? How is evidence utilized and integrated into the decision-making process? How does it inform the design and execution of skill development interventions for women? How is evidence used in strengthening implementation of skill development programmes in India?
Pankaj Shrivastav
RCTs are generally considered to be the most rigorous and reliable method for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions because the random assignment of subjects helps to control for other factors that might influence the outcomes of the study. However, due to logistical and ethical challenges, RCTs can be difficult to implement in development contexts, particularly in low-income countries.
The relevance of RCTs for development assessments in India depends on the specific development programs being evaluated and the research questions being addressed.
In general, RCTs can be a useful tool for evaluating the effectiveness of development programs in India, particularly in the field of health. However, it is important to consider the limitations of RCTs and to use a variety of evaluation methods in order to get a comprehensive understanding of the impacts of development programs in India.
example, if an RCT is being conducted in a low-income community, and the intervention being tested is not made available to the control group, this could create ethical concerns and potentially lead to negative consequences for individuals in the control group.
To understand the above topic, some important questions to consider might include:
- What is the specific context in which the RCT is being conducted, and how might this influence the feasibility and usefulness of the evaluation?
- How were subjects recruited for the RCT, and what were the criteria for inclusion and exclusion?
- What are the potential risks and benefits of the intervention being tested for both the intervention group and the control group?
- How will the results of the RCT be used, and who will be impacted by the findings?
- What alternative evaluation methods might be more appropriate in this context, and why?
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Agricultural Science
- Agronomy
- Crop Science
- Crop