Hello fellow Researchers,

perhaps some of you could help me a bit with figuring out what stays behind the mysterious phenomenon of NH3 volatilization from the sandy soil treated with glukose.

Brief explanation below:

As a part of the project that I am currently researching, I am running an incubation (mesocosm) experiment to identify a connection between the different properties of manure/slurries and the GHG and ammonia emissions caused by their soil application. As a "referencing" controls, aside from the blanks, I used UREA and CAN as a mineral nitrogen source, and glukoze as an only carbon-input treatment. The idea for the glukoze was to see the effect of easily degradable/bioavailable carbon source on N2O soil emissions. I was curious to see if N2O emissions caused by manure application are affected mostly by N-NH4+ and N-organict input or also because of significant carbon input. Me and my team hoped that carbon only (in this case glukose) treatment could, not precisely but still, help to identify the above.

Besides registering small fluxes of N2O caused by glukoze application (that was an expected outcome), we noticed a huge effect on NH3 volatilization that not me, nor my colleagues, can explain.

I did some additional tests in the form of regular pot experiments but these ammonia phenomena are repeatitibly occuring.

The highest fluxes were noticed around 5-8 days after application. I did the measurements using a static closed chamber technique (with linear increase based closure time) with a photoacustic analizer Innova 1512.

Hope to get some nice and inspirational potential answers!

Cheers

Sebastian

More Sebastian Kuśmierz's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions