Why we do stopped at the old theory?

We need to new understanding of spacetime, energy, speed and acceleration.

Motion is an intrinsic property of physical existence. But there is a problem about concept of acceleration in theoretical physics. First of all, what we know about acceleration? And what is the definition of acceleration?

In physics, acceleration is the rate at which the velocity of an object changes over time that in classical mechanics is given by Newton's second law with a=F/m. In special relativity an accelerating particle has a world-line which is not straight. This is not difficult to handle. The 4-vector acceleration can be defined as the derivative with respect to proper time of the 4-velocity. It is possible to solve the equations of motion for a particle in electric and magnetic fields, for example. Accelerating reference frames is a different matter. In general relativity the physical equations take the same form in any co-ordinate system. In special relativity they do not but it is still possible to use co-ordinate systems corresponding to accelerating or rotating frames of reference just as it is possible to solve ordinary mechanics problems in curvilinear co-ordinate systems. This is done by introducing a metric tensor.

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/acceleration.html

However, Newton and Einstein define the acceleration regardless of the structure of particles (in classical mechanics and relativity). This definition belongs to Newton era or macroscopic level era. It should be noted that the interaction between large objects (e.g. collision of two bodies) under the action of the quantum layer (in fact sub quantum level) has been done. Thus, according to quantum mechanics and mass–energy equivalence E=mc^2, we must redefine acceleration. It means we should review the relativistic Newton's second law.

There are a lot unanswered questions and complex concepts in theoretical physics that the standard model and relativity do not have answers for and the physicists believe that it is due to the inability of theories.

By using review of relativistic Newton's second law we can explain zero point energy and vacuum energy directly (without using the uncertainty principle). Also, it is a powerful tool to answer the unanswered questions and complex concepts in theoretical physics. According to the special relativity theory, nothing moves faster than light speed. Also, boundary between visible particle and invisible particles is light speed, where real space-time and virtual spacetime intertwine and interact with other.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279185909_Graviton_and_Newton%27s_second_law?ev=prf_pub

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270276224_Interactions_Between_Real_and_Virtual_Spacetimes?ev=prf_pub

Article Graviton and Newton's second law

Article Interactions Between Real and Virtual Spacetimes

"The New Physics" --Fermilab Scientists Search for Undiscovered Particles Beyond the Standard Model

"We have reason to believe that there are yet undiscovered subatomic particles that are not part of the Standard Model," explains Fermilab scientist Ruth Van De Water. "Generally, we expect them to be heavier than any subatomic particles we have found so far. The new particles would be part of a new theory that would look like the SM at low energies. Additionally, the new theory should account for the astrophysical observations of dark matter and dark energy. The particle nature of dark matter is a complete mystery."

http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2015/10/a-new-physics-fermilab-scientists-search-for-undiscovered-particles-beyond-the-standard-model-2.html

In generally, of the first we need to ensure that our theory is exactly compatible with the laws of nature or not? For example, is exactly relativistic Newton's second law compatible with the laws of nature?

Reconsidering relativistic Newton's second law and its results

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280491440_Reconsidering_relativistic_Newton%27s_second_law_and_its_results?ev=prf_pub

Article Reconsidering relativistic Newton's second law and its results

Dear Hossein,

thanks for your message with regard to the question of the Standard Model. I subscribe your doubts relative to a few questions of the Standard Model and in general of the  modern and postmodern physics. I would want to inform you that as per those doubts I had the necessity to begin many years ago a road of critical research that led me to formulate the "Theory of Reference Frames" for questions concerning dynamics and relativity, the "Deterministic Quantum Physics" for questions concerning the atom structure and the behavior of electrons inside atom, the "Non-Standard Model" for questions concerning particle physics. Those three theories are fundamental theories that allow me to have a further theoretical tool for understanding nature and laws of physics where standard theories fail. In particular the Non-Standard Model goes beyond the BSM and it derives from a strong criticism to foundations of the Standard Model. I think I did a good work that may be useful for further theoretical developments of physics.

Best regards.

replacing Hubble's Law (that cosmological redshift is due to a renewed expannsion of the universe post cosmic inflation epoch) with The Pearlman SPIRAL cosmological redshift hypothesis, (that indicates a loitering universe 5776 years old) might align all the factual loose ends.

Dear Roger,

I think cosmology is a very interesting and very open science where much research has to be still done and every good idea may be useful in order to improve our knowledge of the nature and of the universe.

Dear Daniele

I appreciate you efforts to develop our understanding of nature, thank you so much.

"In particular the Non-Standard Model goes beyond the BSM and it derives from a strong criticism to foundations of the Standard Model."

In my view, it was predictable that any attempt to solving the Standard Model goes beyond the BSM.

I hope success for more you.

Best Regards

Hossein

CERN “GRAVITON” “OPENS DOOR” to Multiple Universe, Space- TIme & “BOTTOMLESS PIT”

http://investmentwatchblog.com/cern-graviton-opens-door-to-multiple-universe-space-time-bottomless-pit/

And

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=noeelFDsKS4