Cai Rongman  in his PhD dissertation hypothesized that highly virulent P. syringae crop pathogens with narrow host range might have evolved after the advent of agriculture from ancestral P. syringae strains with wide host range that were adapted to mixed plant communities. I know that P. s. pv. syringae (phylogroup 2) has the smallest number of T3SS effectors and IS in their genome. According to early works (like "Phylogeny of the genus Pseudomonas:intrageneric structure reconstructed from the nucleotide sequences of gyrB and rpoD genes" Microbiology (2000), 146, 2385–2394) Ps pv. syringae is more close to the last common ancestor than other phylogroups, but more recent trees place other groups with more specialized pathovars close to LCA. Can it be that NJ trees are not correct method to obtain true phylogeny of P. syringae?

More Alex Ignatov's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions