A discussion of both pros and cons would be useful. For example, what has been said of some developing countries with high levels of poverty is that advertising of products can create a desire in poor people who cannot afford them thus leading to negative feelings. What do you think of advertisements where they sugar coat the benefits of the product or lie outright about its advantages?
this link is useful
iml.jou.ufl.edu/projects/Fall02/Vanderkochhove/positives.html
regards
Well, it's for local authorities to crack down on untrue advertising. So many companies are now international that you can't rely on other governments to do it. An international agency would be a very good thing.
Advertising junk that people living with limited resources can't afford is another key problem. That might have to be monitored locally, and discouraged. Contra advertising by authorities might help.
And, of course, some advertising is very useful. If the "goods" are good and not bad allow it. If the ads are educational, allow them. Also sorts of benefits can accrue from useful goods and services being well advertised.
Christopher NOCK
this link is useful
iml.jou.ufl.edu/projects/Fall02/Vanderkochhove/positives.html
regards
The famous locus classics Common law judicial verdict that may be applicable to Hyperbolic advertisements is the case of CARLISLE V CARBOLIC SMOKE BALL COMPANY.
Exaggerated Ads content carry no legal consequence. However, a buyer who intends to purchase the item should do so under the understanding of a specific set of terms that may guide the contract. Where the item is not fit for purpose or of merchantable quality or defective, a court of law can grant damages for the breach.
Regulation of advertising campaigns of corporate bodies usually do not extend to determining or forestalling ads laden with exaggerated content.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Psychology
- Emotion