The collapsibility of the soil can be estimated from the term (collapse potential-CP) which can be obtained from two types of tests performed in the odometer device:(1) Single Oedometer Test (SCT) and (2) Double Odometer Test (DOT).
Generally, Increasing of gypsum content leads to increase the collapse potential of soil due to increase the solubility of gypsum in the soil. the severity of collapse depends on the solubility of gypsum, which depending on the many conditions such as gypsum type, temperature, type of water etc...
(1) The density of the basic element of the soil and the stability of its mineralogy.
(2) At a given soil type and density, it depends on the percentage (%) of cementing agent (gypsum), and slightly on its initial moisture content.
(3) At the given mineralogy, density and gypsum percentage, the homogeneity and the isotropy of the soil as well as the uniformity of the gypsum distribution are also factors. (Have considerable uncertainty though)
II. Loading/functional conditions
(1) The salinity of the water, which, in your case, is supposed to be controlled.
(2) The mode of application of water.
(3) The weight of gypsum to the weight of the saturation water.
III. Conclusion
(1) From all of the above, and keeping other factors stationary, the high percentage of gypsum gives rise to more mobilized collapse, as long as the void ratio is large enough to accommodate adequate amount of water to dissolve the gypsum.
(2) If the amount of water is not adequate to dissolve all the gypsum, the larger gypsum % will result in a better stability and less collapse settlement.
(3) If the soil matrix is subject to flowing water, the solubility issue will not govern, and the low gypsum% sample/formation will give larger settlement on the shorter term, while the high gypsum% sample/formation will exhibit larger settlement of the long run.
IV. Limitation
I would like to also mention that the problem has linearity, which depends on the magnitude of the difference between the analyzed gypsum%, due to the variation of the test matrix composition in the background.
Thanks a lot for your detailed, very specific and scientific answer.
I like your classification for the collapse mechanism and deformation strategy.
Actually the high amount of Gypsum content may not lead to further collapse deformation especially when wetting under soaking condition.
I agree with you, follow of water through the soil mass by (Leaching Phenomenon) can be introduced a sever collapse deformation due to more dissolution of gypsum particles.
The increases in Gypsum content in the soil will increase the collapse potential CP up to optimum value. High amount of Gypsum of more than 80% in the soil may not dissolve any more by water due to the closing of all voids.
OC (Cp), in the 1st test, collapse occurs in one stage as a result of gypsum dissolving but at the 2nd test , the collapse occurs due to dissolving and washing out fine particles which leads to a fluctuation in soil skeleton and permeability throughout 3 stages, in general the final permeability increasing for high gypsum content and decreasing with low gypsum content.