As Julian Gough said, out of these 2 programs, go for MUSCLE.
ClustalW implements an iterative algorithm so mistakes produce in earlier step are quite unlikely to be corrected in later step meanwhile muscle implements an progressive algorithm allowing re-optimizations of columns during the whole process.
I'd recommend to give a try to MAFFT if you are looking for programs as fast as MUSCLE with a variety of algorithms depending on how many sequences you have. An alternative is T-Coffee, slower than Mafft or Muscle but with really good performance.