Actually there is no difference between the Theory of Evolution by Darwin and the Concept of Dashavatar. In my point of view, both means same in their own aspect.
In Simple, Darwin's Theory of evolution is the Scientific proof for Concepts of Dashavatar and Concepts of Dashavatar is the theoretical proof for studies related to nature & behavior of living things at various stages of evolution.
Actually there is no difference between the Theory of Evolution by Darwin and the Concept of Dashavatar. In my point of view, both means same in their own aspect.
In Simple, Darwin's Theory of evolution is the Scientific proof for Concepts of Dashavatar and Concepts of Dashavatar is the theoretical proof for studies related to nature & behavior of living things at various stages of evolution.
Yes Sir our ancestors saved this highly priced documental proof from being getting lost into history simply by adding the faith and religion to it. and as planned, now every one who knows dashavatar can easily talk about Darwin's theory without need of any expertise.
I think that the comparison can be misleading. The Dashavatar, if I got it right, seems to describe patterns – i.e. the stages of a history of progress. Darwinism (i.e. the evolutionary theory of Darwin and Wallace) is a theory about population changes (not progress): Why the distribution of a phenotypic trait changes from one generation to the next? For purposes of analogy, it might be more appropriate to evoke the model of the major transitions proposed by Maynard Smith & Szathmáry (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Major_Transitions_in_Evolution).