Most of the time co authors without any contribution dominate the claim of the article after the publication than that of author.Hence I like to know the criteria and rights of the co authors
Never co-author articles or have co-authors. They will steal your data and list your papers as their own even though you are first author. Publish on your own if you can with as few references as possible, then your article is elegant and novel. Einstein did it like that! :)
Nowadays, most articles in science have more than one author, in high-energy physics even several hundred or several thousand authors. See these previous discussions on co-authorship:
The basic criteria include the original contribution of the co-authors to the study or the research work. The research supervisor and other members of the research advisory committee may be given the co-authorship subject to their level of contribution/guidance to the research work. Giving co-authorship to those who don't contribute really is an unethical practice.
My suggestion is that you should include authors who fulfil all the criteria of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Many journals say this specifically but even if they are more relaxed, I would still follow these conventions.
With these considerations, I have got the number of authors from 20 to 6 on most occasions in recent times.