In the present scenario, people require every information on tips and very fast and accurate. Due to time constraints, every one depends on easy output through internet searches. Using Online sources for best promotion or marketing is advisable. Social networks play a major role reaching to large audience.

Dear Oujlakh Bahéra, Thank you very much for asking this very important question.

Question:

What is the best way to communicate on research nowadays?

this is a very important issue that requires scientific research.

Dear Oujlakh Bahéra, Thank you very much for making very important inquiries on the Research Gate portal and inspiring important discussions on particularly important issues.

The topics that are the subject of discussion are particularly important and scientifically important and in the context of human life.

I wish you all good and best regards

This research portal Research Gate is a good solution to this issue, because it enables establishing scientific contacts on a global scale. Conducted discussions on scientific topics make it easier to contact scientists who research similar scientific topics and conduct similar research. In this way, discussions and publishing scientific papers facilitate the creation of joint research teams.

The RG research portal makes it easier to establish cooperation between scientists operating in various places around the globe.

I invite you to the discussion

How does the Research Gate portal support research projects and analytical work carried out in the field of research?

Research Gate is a very useful science portal in which scientists and researchers and practitioners can find interesting scientific publications on a specific topic. In addition, it is possible to set up research teams, including international ones, at RG. RG is also an excellent form of scientific information exchange, including the results of scientific research between researchers conducting research work in analogous problems. RG is also a huge database of scientific publications that can be quickly found on a given topic in the RG search engine. In connection with the above, RG has many advantages that determine the rapid development of this portal.

I invite you to the discussion

I believe that there is no direct, strict correlation in this matter, because the RG score is made up of many factors. The algorithm generating the RG score is complex, it includes many determinants, areas of scientific activity and in this way it is a highly objective result. However, if you are asking about the assessment of the quality of your scientific activity, the number of citations of scientific publications is one of the most important indicators in this respect. On the other hand, each point system will never be perfect, because the quality of scientific activity, including the quality of scientific research and scientific publications containing the results of these research is mainly non-quantifiable, non-quantitative, only of a qualitative nature. In addition, research conducted in various fields of knowledge and science are often not comparable because they sometimes relate to a completely different nature of knowledge. One field of knowledge and science is more of a quantitative nature, others more qualitative. Some generate implementation possibilities, such as in technical and technological sciences, while others, more humanistic or artistic ones, generate added values ??for learning and people's lives in a completely different way. Therefore, even the same RG point score but for other fields of science does not necessarily mean the same assessment, because specific fields of knowledge may not be comparable. However, there is a need to build and improve the system of evaluation of scientific achievements and scientific activity according to a specific formula and with the consideration of specific determinants. It seems to me that the Research Gate portal does it very well.

I invite you to the discussion

How to develop scientific activity to generate the greatest added value for science?

Taking into account the complex algorithm of the RG quantitative indicator of scientific activity, it is necessary to develop the scientific activity in a multi-directional way, conducting interesting scientific research and writing scientific publications containing the results of these research. In addition, one should also be active in other areas of scientific activity.

I invite you to the discuss

The qualitative nature of scientific activity is not easy to precisely measure with the scoring system. In many discussions, the question arises about the algorithm for quantifying scientific activity on the RG portal. In my opinion, taking into account the complex algorithm of the RG quantitative indicator of scientific activity, it is necessary to develop the scientific activity in a multi-directional way, conducting interesting scientific research and writing scientific publications containing the results of these research. In addition, one should also be active in other fields of scientific activity. In addition, I do not think there is a direct, close correlation between the quantitative measurement and the assessment of the added value of scientific activity for science, because the RG score is made up of many different types of factors. The algorithm generating the RG score is complex, it includes many determinants, areas of scientific activity and in this way it is a highly objective result. However, if you are asking about the assessment of the quality of your scientific activity, the number of citations of scientific publications is one of the most important indicators in this respect. On the other hand, each point system will never be perfect, because the quality of scientific activity, including the quality of scientific research and scientific publications containing the results of these research is mainly non-quantifiable, non-quantitative, only of a qualitative nature. In addition, research conducted in various fields of knowledge and science are often not comparable because they sometimes relate to a completely different nature of knowledge. One field of knowledge and science is more of a quantitative nature, others more qualitative. Some generate implementation possibilities, such as in technical and technological sciences, while others, more humanistic or artistic ones, generate added values ??for learning and people's lives in a completely different way. Therefore, even the same RG point score but for other fields of science does not necessarily mean the same assessment, because specific fields of knowledge may not be comparable. However, there is a need to build and improve the system of evaluation of scientific achievements and scientific activity according to a specific formula and with the consideration of specific determinants. It seems to me that the Research Gate portal does it very well.

I invite you to the discuss

How to effectively increase the score of the RG score?

In my opinion, we need to carry out innovative research projects, obtain sectoral results from scientific research, which will be cited many times by many scientists and researchers of the given issue, and will be cited in many scientific publications. This is the most important issue, other tools that have an impact on the score score RG are secondary to what I wrote above.

I invite you to the discussion

Knowledge of research methodology and procedures and statistical treatments are the most important in writing research.