I do not know exactly what you are looking for. However, I myself was very much inspired by the way Nietzsche employs an aesthetic analysis to fundamentally challenge our understanding of the world, an approach that we now see reflected in evolutionary cognitive science and that I recognized from a Peircean semiotic perspective. Maybe that may be of any use? The article is here on RG, free to download (A chair is still a chair …) , but I also add the file.

Paul Van den Hoven

Thank you so much

The involvement of aesthetic aspects in comprehending an issue may either be based on common sense, or driven by prinipled understandings. In linguistic morphology, for instance, the derivation of a certain lexical item (a word) may be blocked because of nothing, but only of intolerance by common people's sense. Let alone, if there was a principled disfavour of something being based on logical arguments, as is the case of hating certain architectural designs.