Greetings fellow researchers,
We have researched the Frankl theory, which suggests that subscribing to nihilism can lead to experiencing existential vacuum (Man's Search for Meaning, p.111). Furthermore, we have studied how this phenomenon poses a threat to psychotherapy (Article The feeling of meaninglessness: A challenge to psychotherapy
). We have investigated how internet usage and existential nihilism affect the experience of existential vacuum.As we have decided to take this research further for publication, I would like to gather your insights on selecting appropriate journals, approaching them, how the university affiliation can help, the ethical process, and whether we can take assistance from a guide or the university. We appreciate any additional insights or experiences you may have on the topic.
Thank you!
Dear Vinod, publication in any field, let alone Psychology, is not an exact science. While we would like to believe that the publication process is completely bias-free and accessible for everyone, the reality is that there is a definite learning curve.
Both publications and the publishers (Journals, Books, etc.) vary in terms of their quality, acceptance rate, aims and scopes, and charges. This makes navigating this landscape possibly overwhelming, especially for a student. I know I was when I began, and even now, I would not say that I know all the ins and outs.
So, here is what I suggest.
1. Be a part of a good research team: The most success I have gotten in terms of publication has been as a part of teams (or research bubbles) on various topics. I can say that working with these teams has taught me about topics I wouldn't have come across otherwise.
2. Browse through journals: This is advice that I have given to my master's students, who are looking to publish as well. Look through recent publications in your areas of interest and see what journals they have used. Look at them; look at other similar ones, which might be easier to access. Go through their aims and scopes etc, and you will find the right one for you.
3. Take risks: You won't get any publications from not sending papers to journals. Rejection is a part of the process, and the reviewer's comments will generally improve the papers.
4. Talk to people: You are doing that already, so keep doing it. But make sure that your researchgate connections translate in real life, and you develop professional contacts as well.
I think this is enough for a brief idea, but, I am always looking for driven, inspiring people to work with, maybe we can connect further?
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Chemistry
- Pharmacology
- Pharmaceuticals
- Drugs