My current study explores the psychology of how children learn about other nations through the media and is examining a television series with anthropomorphised animals.

The first stage involved examining the series to better understand how national identities are assigned to animal characters.

I was editing my findings section and happened to notice that the values in columns labelled CFAs and CSAs were equal or close to half the values in IFAs and ISAs, except for the bottom left two cells (28 and 8).

For contexts, the column labels stand for Individual Feature Animals, Collective Feature Animals, Individual Supporting Animals and Collective Supporting Animals.

Feature refers to animals who were the focus of a narrative.

Supporting refers to animals who contributed to a narrative but weren't the focus.

Individual refers to single animals.

Collective refers to groups of two or more animals - like a pod of whales - or references to entire species.

I feel like I might be digging a bit too deep here, but is there a statistical analysis that could potentially identify a relationship between the values presented?