Multi-modal monitoring for malignant cerebral edema, increased ICP, and other conditions is rapidly gaining favor amongst our Neurological ICU and Neurosurgery community. Thus far, no standard of care has been established. And the data collected from intracranial device monitors such as the Licox and depth electrode EEGs have variable clinical significance. Regardless, the trend will likely continue.

A host of new devices now promise use of infrared and other technology for noninvasive multi-modal monitoring. If proven with accuracy, this would not only be superior to intracranial monitors due to lack of infections and other concerns, but could also being this possibility to a host of patients who have contraindications to or do not want neurological surgery.

I am curious what devices you are using at your institutions and how has your experience been so far? Specifically, do you feel the noninvasive device is as accurate as the current intracranial devices and do you have data correlating the two to affirm this?

More Amit Chaudhari's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions