We are almost aware of the benefits of NANO Fertilizer over Conventional bulk fertilizer. But What can restrict Nano from being a successful alternative. Please share your valuable views.
Search on the RG platform as this question has been asked and answered many times. The answer is simply economics...
Why pay up to thousands of dollars per gram for a so-called 'nano' product when bulk fertilizer is a few $'s per kilogram? Many of the traditional fertilizers (e.g. urea, ammonium nitrate) are water soluble so there's no benefit in making them smaller.
The reason of not using NANO Fertilizer over Conventional bulk fertilizer is the less knowledge of growers or farmers because until now they are not believing on them as a an alternative to the conventional ones. Also it might be that the NANO Fertilizer cost more that the conventional bulk fertilizer. Awareness of growers about the side effects conventional fertilizer is the first step to start using NANO ones.
Firas Al-Zyoud Sir so far the market news the cost of Nano fertilizer is at par with the bulk one. Ya, knowledge of the growers in this new technology is an issue, But I do believe if any technology is successful in the field, farmers will adopt it for sure with time.
Alan F Rawle Sir, It may be to reduce the transportation cost, Application Cost as well as the subsidy amount provided from Govt fund. On the other hand, there is a huge residual effect of bulk fertilizer like urea regarding groundwater Nitrate pollution (A reason to worry in the Punjab-Haryana belt), soil residue, etc. This may also be mitigated through the use of Nanotechnology.
The other aspect of risk involved for nano inputs is more important and it is risk to human, animals and environment. Health and environment hazard aspect is required to be studied deeply.
Suresh K Malhotra Respected Sir, Will you please share some literature regarding Its effects on human health and environmental hazard. I am not much aware of the fact.
Various law & regulation and risk management of NFs are the primary barriers to advocating it for sustainable agriculture.
A further key constraint is the manufacturing and availability of NFs in large enough amounts, which is the most significant barrier to the widespread adoption of NFs.
Though, NFs in sustainable crop production provide numerous benefits and these benefits may come at higher costs.
The use of NFs in agricultural systems raises a number of safety and ethical considerations, as NFs can cause health problems. Unintended health, safety, and environmental problems are likely to limit their usage in agricultural crop production in this situation.
Besides that, these have the potential to invade the food chain, increasing their spread in non-targeted living organisms.
Last but not the least, the most challenging task is convincing farmers who have been using chemical fertilizers for years.