El Nino is believed to have brought the 1993 Mississippi and 1995 California floods, drought conditions in South America, Africa and Australia. Sometimes the absence of stroms in places adjoining North Atlantic in USA is attributed to El Nino.

This is not misinformation. This information I obtained from literature. in case you need be enlightened I would provide the source. instead of asking for the proof or source do not write comments like this.

ok, you are right i was a bit harsh. BUT, you are not right since you are NOT referring to the major Nino events of 1988 or 1997-98. These have the major impacts. Try going through some classic climatology papers on ENSO then you will see that "associating" a flood or drought during the years you provided is not as simple. We live in the era of correlations, and anyone can use some nice colors to associate anything with anything. I prefer to look things from a physical mechanism point of view. Again, sorry if i came on to you, but i see things written that kind of misleading, even when this in not intentional!

By October/ November low air pressure of the tropical western pacific causing weakening of the trade winds. This reversal in pressure condition facilitates the return of warm sea water which was driven from the coasts of South America westward towards the tropical east Pacific. As a result low air pressure is formed in the south east Pacific mainly nearby Peru and Equador, AND UPWELLING OF COLD SEA WATER IS PAUSED, WARM AIR RISES UPWARD, TURNS UNSTABLE , POURING DOWN HEAVY RAINFALL.......EL-NINO.

You are right. Small correction; there is no "low pressure" or October/November. El Nino is not seasonal nor a pressure related phenomenon. The full explanation "why El Nino" occurs is not straightforward and in terms of appearance frequency it has been observed that it reappears on average every 7-8 years

it is true that it is better to analyse data from a physical mechanism point of view, and that the answer to ENSO is not straightforward, never the less, the instrumental data is very short to derive the causes of ENSO in order to be able to expand the predictability period. So here is when correlations of instrumental data with proxi data can be very usefull to understand past conditions far from instrumental data.

The cause generally believed by oceanographers is the arrival of a Kelvin wave at the coast of Peru. The origin of that wave is in the central equatorial Pacific where it is caused by the slackening of trade winds. This slackening is part of the El Nino cycle which is generally accepted by climate scientists as a coupled ocean atmosphere effect.

The Kelvin wave arriving at the Peruvian coast causes cold water at depth to be pushed further into the depths. This results in two things: A warming of surface coastal waters and a suppression of the upwelling nutrient rich deep waters.

The net effect is warmer waters and a sharp reduction in fish populations which no longer have the nutrients avaialble to them.

El Nino is Spanish Word and also the influencing factor environment. thanks

i have been interested also in relationships between tectonics, sun cycles and tides, I believe the sun busts and sun spot activity and its effect on the earth are quite marked in some years and cycles.

The conditions of temperature and pressure of the sea and air are just a consequence of internal heating of the lithosphere through thermal conduction between the core and that.

The decadal solar rhythms, generated or caused by overheating "the-girl" and cooling "the-child" of the sea and the continental ridges emanations of the great flaws oceanic.

Eventually a solar wind changes abruptly, causing a shake of the nucleus, which in turn caused and the earthquake of December 26, 2004, and consequently the tsunami.

This is the cause of the cause

If you look to carefully coronal mass emission CMEs from the Sun, these have a direct correlation with the geomagnetic field, are in hot spot or normal emission, consequently, the effects on the angular momentum or core shocks have a delay due to the discontinuities in the properties of the mantle, eventually causing the amplification or attenuation of seismic waves undampened second degree or not.

This you can see when quantifies all the earthquakes that occur worldwide in a day, with all goemágneticas and solar variations, also in a day.

On the other hand the energy as heat (in the low frequency infrared) indicates local heating due only in the region of the epicenter, because the damped wave, paste ultimately under the lithosphere, besides causing a rash or a earthquake.

If you review the new version expanded the article, called "REPORT Geomagnetic RGS."

Good point, Eduardo.

Hi, this video can help a lot, but is in Spanish, sorry.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDJUPk6iVRQ&feature=related

Parte de lo necesario para entender esta correlación es no pensar en unicamente ciclos solares de 11.3 años, ya que este ciclo es subsecuente al de 260 dias, 420, 840, ..... dias etc.

Por otro lado que existan promotores y precursores sismicos, no quiere decir que sea fácil predecirlos.

Gracias por su apoyo

Part of what needed to understand this correlation is not only thinking about solar cycles of 11.3 years, as this cycle of 260 days subsequent to, 420, 840, ..... etc. days.

On the other hand there are promoters and seismic precursors, does not mean that it is easy to predict.

Thanks for your support

The rotation of the sun occurs differentially due to different densities and convective currents within it, (in Ecuador is 26 days and nearby polar than 40 days) This differential rotation causes a rotational precisely, with consequent eddies or sunspots, but constantly emits particles at that pace.

Que'260 Why? that is the multiple of 13 x 20 or 26 x 40

you can check in web.nasa.gov

The rotation of the sun occurs differentially due to different densities and convective currents within it, (in Ecuador is 26 days and nearby polar than 40 days) This differential rotation causes a rotational precisely, with consequent swirls or sunspots, but continuously emits particles at that pace.

Que'260 Why? that is the multiple of 13 x 20 or 26 x 40

you can check in web.nasa.gov

Besides I have already mapped this emission rate and check very well with the rhythms of NASA solar radiation from outside the atmosphere or in your case if you want and can, with those of Milutin Milankovich. from within the atmosphere.

No, 2x260

rather, 40x26

The last count of 1,000,000 active volcanoes and terrestrial ocean, the former was 54,000.

Definitely being heated inside!

The oceanic and atmospheric phenomenon known as El Niño occurs in the Pacific Ocean when the western coasts of Ecuador and Peru experience unusually warm ocean conditions that cause climatic disturbances of varying severity.

These extreme climatic conditions occur every three to seven years and can affect climates around the world for more than a year.

South American fishermen have given this phenomenon the name El Niño, which is Spanish for "the Boy Child," because it comes about the time of the celebration of the birth of the Christ Child.