They haven’t, because the interesting part isn’t in the view 9f physical reality, since that hasn’t changed, but in the fact that this aspect can now be studied using real devices. That wasn’t possible until now (it was possible already 40 years ago, when Aspect did his experiments, but not on the ``industrial scale it is starting to be today).

Aspect's experiments and entanglement are just more anomalies the should (but don't) begin to change the orthodox physics. Discussions about the aether should re-emerge. van Flandern's an de Sangro's observations should become critical.

That things are interconnected, more holistic reality, not just local reality.

Sometimes : That some initial condition in the past can be carried forward in time unscathed. For example strong relation between 2 particles at some point when they are close, can be carried forward in time as they greatly separate. Thats more continuity or stability.

Dear Aikaterini Galanou

When you read my articles, you would realize that QM does not exist.

Deleted research item The research item mentioned here has been deleted

The typical example a spin zero Boson splits into two Ferions spin 1/2 each.

Two opposite spin 1/2 carried along as the fermions separate. Its mysterious

correlation when they are far away.

Such correlations can be wrecked by environmental noise, the big problem of Quantum computation,any noise will wreck it. Much of QM is energy conservation.

Jocker Javad strikes again!

Nothing has really changed, apart from experimental apparatuses that are now capable of detecting a single spin and such. Founding fathers of math physics and logicians knew all along about entanglement and much more, they simply did not use that particular word, and called states, such as a triplet, strongly correlated.

Moreover. Leibniz published several papers on logic in physics, and how a mathematical description of physical phenomena is not quite (sometimes not al all) what physicists thought they were. In particular, he introduced 2 logical principles, called (following Simon Sanders) in modern logic literature the Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR) and the Principle of Identity of Indiscernibles (PII), that identify states physicists called "entangled" now days as weakly related (in the logical meaning of the term). Thus, Leibniz argued that within such weakly related conglomerates one could not identify individual particles without breaking that entity. If physicists knew a bit of math logic, many "paradoxes" of quantum theory would not be thought of as paradoxes. Thus, measuring 2 separate spins, ones forming a triplet, and then separated by a huge distance from one another, does not mean non-locality or an "infinite" speed of their interactions. It simply means that one measures a completely different system, which is not a triplet any more and has nothing to do with that original triplet. Once one "separates" the triplet by wishful thinking into 2 electrons, there are only 2 logical options remaining: measuring spin +1/2 or -1/2. So, once Alice measured, say +1/2, Bob (or whoever) would know without any measurements that he would have -1/2 (also, Yuri Volovich discussed this example from rigorous probability theory standpoint). This happens because, in the first place, inseparable entity (triplet) was split in 2 separate objects whose spins were assumed to be known as +1/2 and -1/2. Thus, the original entity (triplet) was broken, and completely different system (2 separated spins) measured. In physics terms, thinking along standard lines about this system (EPR "paradox"), one makes an implicit mistake of assigning an "infinitely" large speed of interaction between the two spins (because there is no other way to split the triplet, and still consider it as that triplet). There is no quantum non-locality in this sense (or paradoxes of that kind), or infinite speeds of interaction in quantum theory. Instead, there are logical mistakes of thinking about one system and measuring quite another, assigning the measured properties to the original system that does not exist any more. One cannot separate electrons in the triplet and keep thinking of them as still being the triplet.