Given the fact that the resilience concept in Disaster Science is new, how can we define it in a way that it is differentiated from the typical vulnerability concept? What (or what type of) indicators one should utilize to assess them both?
Vulnerability and resilience of a community to disasters have many dimensions (i.e., social, economic, environmental, infrastructure, etc.). And there are multiple indicators, models and frameworks that have been developed in the last couple of decades. The concepts are far from new to the disaster science field, and significant advancements were made too.
For social vulnerability, I would recommend you read Cutter et al. (2003), it is one of the most recognized social vulnerability models in the States.
The resilience concept in Disaster Science is NOT new! You need to read a bit more on its history. There are three issues that are normally considered together, Vis, risk, vulnerability and resilience. These are not synonymous though. Good luck in your research work.
Here is our latest paper on Risk-resilience-sustainability nexus. We employ a hazard-vulnerability-resilience approach for risk evaluation of coastal communities to natural hazards.
Deleted research itemThe research item mentioned here has been deleted