1. You must check if the Journal is predatory

2. If not, you can accept but take some considerations

- If you don´t have previous experience, try to request feedback or examples from colleagues with some experience about how to do a good review

- I usually do not accept requests from very low profile journals: usually, the papers form these journals will take a lot of your time

- you must have time to do a good review.

Dear F. O. Farid,

Thanks for your recommendations.

I am Reviewer at "Elsevier", "Springer", "Sage Pub", "Taylor & Francis" and "IOS Press" publishers.

In my opinion, Editor in chief should attract the reviewers with the compromising interactions.

Dear Professor,

My recommendation is to accept the invitation to be a reviewer. It will give you more knowledge and exposure.

These links could help

https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/authorandreviewertutorials/howtopeerreview/accepting-an-invitation-to-review/10286396

https://www.editage.com/insights/accepting-a-peer-review-invitation-tips-for-first-time-peer-reviewers

https://hub.wiley.com/community/exchanges/discover/blog/2015/03/12/how-when-and-why-to-say-no-to-a-review-request

Accept it. But check first if it is not a predatory journal. It would be better if the journal is indexed in ISI and Scopus.

It is always good to review a paper, it it is related to your field of study.

Reviewing a paper is good experience and a source of knowledge.

agree with @ Jack Son

regards

My recommendation is to accept the invitation .

regards

1. You must check if the Journal is predatory

2. If not, you can accept but take some considerations

- If you don´t have previous experience, try to request feedback or examples from colleagues with some experience about how to do a good review

- I usually do not accept requests from very low profile journals: usually, the papers form these journals will take a lot of your time

- you must have time to do a good review.