In calculating the reliability of the tool, what are the problems of using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and what is the new method to replace this method?
McNeish D. Thanks coefficient alpha, we'll take it from here. Psychol Methods. 2018 Sep;23(3):412-433. doi: 10.1037/met0000144
Sijtsma K. On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach's Alpha. Psychometrika. 2009 Mar;74(1):107-120. doi: 10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0
Barbaranelli C, Lee CS, Vellone E, Riegel B. The problem with Cronbach's Alpha: comment on Sijtsma and van der Ark (2015). Nurs Res. 2015 Mar-Apr;64(2):140-5. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000079
Aaron A. Agbo (2010) Cronbach's Alpha: Review of Limitations and Associated Recommendations, Journal of Psychology in Africa, 20:2, 233-239, DOI: 10.1080/14330237.2010.10820371
Cronbach's alpha has some limitations that can affect the accuracy of the results. One of the major limitations is that it assumes that all items on a scale are measuring the same construct, which may not always be the case. Additionally, Cronbach's alpha can be sensitive to the number of items in a scale or test, leading to overestimations of reliability when there are a large number of items, and underestimations when there are a small number of items. Another limitation is that it does not account for measurement error, which can lead to an overestimation of reliability. An alternative measure that can replace Cronbach's alpha is the omega coefficient, which is more robust and an accurate measure of reliability. It considers the number of items, the structure of the items, and the measurement error.