What are the most common difficulties found for preparing the samples (roughness, uniformity), for controlling the test parameters, and what should be done to guarantee repeatability?
The sample preparation plays a very important role while performing pin-on-disk wear test.
The flatness and squareness of the sample is essential while establishing contact with the counter disc.
The alignment (perpendicularity) between the sample holder and the counter disc axis should be carefully checked to ensure that the specimen cross-section contacts the disc appropriately.
The friction coefficient gets affected by the normal load which in turn affects the contact area (asperity to asperity interaction), hence the pulley alignment, Loading lever, LVDT position and the weight hangar need to be checked before the test.
Timely calibration of the pin-on-disc apparatus as specified by the manufacturer has to be ensured.
Since different materials could be tested on the apparatus, there could be left over wear debris from previous tests which could interfere with the future tests and analysis of the wear debris through microscopy techniques would give faulty information. Hence cleaning the disc with suitable solvent and the annular space is advisable before commencing with the new tests.
Some researchers prefer to have a pre-worn specimen to prevent the running in period during which huge fluctuations in the friction coefficients is observed. Meanwhile ASTM G99-05 recommends a surface finish of 0.8 microns.
To ensure repeatability, the heterogeneity in the composition of the material needs to be examined through suitable microscopy like SEM (which would normally affect the friction and wear parameters which has nothing to do with the accuracy of the apparatus).
You could refer to ASTM G99-05 standard for further information on the specs.
As mentioned above by prof. Anand pai, geometrical deviation is important. But more deep reason that such kind of data is easy to disperse, exist in new nano-level mechanism in boundary lubrication regime.If you want to know it, I recommend to read abstracts of our publication.
Most importantly, the vibrations in the apparatus should be at its minimal. Also, it would be important there are no pre-existing wear particle remains. Furthermore, POD is recommended to be considered only for screening purpose.
Vibration is a real problem that I've found in some test rigs developed by non-experts, Mr. Afnan Haider Khan . About the wear particles, is it common cleaning the sample during the test (vacuum cleaning or air jet, for example) ?
The pin-on-disk characterization process presents characteristics of the strength of the material or thin films applied on its surfaces. To evaluate the affected region, we have to take into account all the deformation generated on the surface. Generally, rougher surfaces present more difficulties in the process, another important point is the definitions of the loads used for the tests.
Guicciardi, S., Melandri, C., Lucchini, F., & de Portu, G. (2002). On data dispersion in pin-on-disk wear tests. Wear, 252(11-12), 1001–1006. doi:10.1016/s0043-1648(02)00066-2
you must carefully prepare the surface of your sample. See the distribution of roughness Ra, Rz, Sk ...etc.
and especially apply the same contact pressure to each test.
Make sure the contact type is fixed. You can then control the test by blowing out the wear debris for each test or by leaving the debris formed at the interface of the two friction surfaces. You can also use piezoelectric sensors to measure normal force and tension force to automatically calculate the coefficient of friction.
The environment of your test is also important, for example humidity can play an important role in determining the coefficient of friction.
The applied normal loads have an effect on the wear coefficient.