Eco-Innovation: When Business Meets the Environment, a database of the European Commission available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eco-innovation/index_en.htm, showcases a great many ecologically innovative projects. The Commission's initiative is welcome because too many solutions to the challenges of the 20th century (and before) were ecologically illiterate from being single-problem oriented. Of course, many economic, political, social, and technological advances have improved human life; but, some have also in so doing degraded the ecosystems on which human well-being ultimately depends. Individuals, groups, and societies must build their capacity to learn from, respond to, and manage environmental feedbacks: eco-innovation is welcome but, for scalable impact, must also be accompanied by social innovation that links to it.

Recycling of Trash is also like an ecological innovation which Sweden is doing.

Taking into account technological advances, including new media used in teaching processes and growing problems in the field of economics, social issues, ecology and environmental protection, the question arises: Should knowledge of the basics of economics and ecology be included in the education system of children already? at the initial instruction stage? At what stage of the education system, at what point in the initial education system should children be included in these issues? Should new media, including online applications in the field of new media, be used primarily in teaching methods and tools? What problems in the field of ecology and environmental protection, economics and social sciences should be first of all the subject of primary schooling of children?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

Will changing the entire energy, communication and industry to renewable energy sources and ecological technologies significantly slow down the greenhouse effect on Earth?

Does any of you conduct research in this area? Apparently, the greenhouse effect is an irreversible process. the only thing that can be done is to slow down this process and thus adverse weather anomalies, unusual atmospheric phenomena, disasters caused by climate change. The development of industry based on traditional energy sources, ie burning of minerals, still dominates in many regions of the world. In domestic terms, the management of economies often boils down to economic growth, development of the industry without taking into account environmental protection issues and analysis of greenhouse gas emissions. In national economic policies, the tendency of the race is dominating for a higher number of economic growth, and the negative effects of this growth are forgotten. An attitude is assumed that the next generations are worried about how to solve this problem. Such an approach will accelerate only the negative effects of the global greenhouse effect and the emergence of disasters and natural disasters about the sources of climate change in a larger part of the world. More and more often the question is asked: how can we stop this process only as this process of warming up of average temperatures on Earth could be slowed down? What scale of this downturn could be generated if mankind would start to take this problem seriously? Does any of you conduct research in this area? Has any of you developed a theoretical model that would answer the question: Will switching all energy, communication and industry to renewable energy sources and ecological technologies significantly slow down the greenhouse effect on Earth?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

Even if it were to prove in the future that Sustainable socio-economic development is not possible, in the 21st century, try to do everything to make it possible to get as close as possible to it. However, everything possible should be done to achieve sustainable socio-economic development. In the context of this issue, the following question arises: Whether as part of taking up actions that could develop new sustainable development, or whether bottom-up social movements will inspire politicians to undertake pro-ecological initiatives in the future. At the moment, international conferences are held, during which debates on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and accelerating the processes of generating eco-innovations and implementing renewable energy sources on a larger scale. Perhaps there should be even more of this type of discussion, perhaps the pressure from scientists should be greater than that of politicians, while it is not too late yet? Unless it is too late? But it probably does not make sense to accept, to think that it is too late, but you have to do what you can in the future, in part, be able to implement sustainable socio-economic development. Will humanity survive until the XXII century in comparable living conditions to those present? It is not known, but everything possible must be done to ensure that these conditions are not significantly worsened in terms of the protection of the natural environment and the progressing greenhouse effect on Earth.

In view of the above, I would like to ask you: Is sustainable socio-economic development possible?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

There are many types of innovations emerging in research laboratories and research centers.

In recent years, developed economies have created many technological, process, product, service, marketing, ecological, material and other innovations.

However, which types of innovation will be most important in the 21st century? Will the emergence of new innovations be mainly determined intentionally by specific, pre-planned research projects in research laboratories equipped with modern technology?

Will the emergence of new innovations be determined by financial resources prepared for research and development?

Is it possible to accept arbitrarily that new innovations will be created in such fields as ecology, environmental protection, medicine, energy, construction, biotechnology, agriculture because these issues concern the key problems of the 21st century, i.e. shrinking traditional resources based on minerals of energy sources, the need to develop renewable energy sources, the need to raise agricultural production productivity in agriculture in the situation of shrinking arable land, environmental protection needs, reclamation of the environment devastated by industry, waste segregation, use of secondary raw materials, protection of shrinking drinking water, etc.

Can the process of generating the necessary new innovations be effectively controlled so that new technological solutions, innovative materials, substitutes for traditional raw materials, etc. are created?

And if it is possible, then another question arises: Which types of innovations will prove to be the most important to solve the most serious national and global problems of the 21st century?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

Architectural ecological innovations according to Bill Gates's concept

In connection with the progressing process of global warming, the importance of creating and implementing eco-innovations, including architectural eco-innovations, is growing.

Currently, projects are being created: City of tommorow, Eco City, Vertical Forest etc.

Will humanity manage to realize these projects?

Will the global warming effect of global warming lead to the disaster of many urban agglomerations?

Please reply. I invite you to the discussion

Other architectural ecological innovations

Quite a few of my colleagues do research in green energy, smart housing and smart cities.

Redox fluid batteries

The above question inspired me to the following considerations: What is the role of particular social groups in disseminating the concept of sustainable pro-ecological development based on the concept of a new, green economy? The role of engineers is particularly important for enabling sustainable development, including sustainable pro-ecological development, based on the concept of a new, green economy. Engineers create new technological solutions, new energy technologies, ecological innovations, innovative ecological buildings, develop renewable energy sources in industry and other applications, create automation technologies for waste segregation, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, develop electromobility, carry out investment projects to reclaim a devastated natural environment, etc. Apart from engineers, the key actors are the state as an economic entity and financial institutions, ie the main actors of external financing of environment-friendly investment projects, thanks to which sustainable sustainable development based on the concept of green economy is enabled and implemented. The role of politicians who set the direction of the necessary systemic changes is also important. Also important is the role of citizens who within the civil and information society are increasingly aware of the threats to the growing risk of climatic cataclysms that are a derivative of the progressive global warming. The role of mass media and new online media is important, including social media portals, thanks to which the level of social awareness for this type of important problems, particularly important in the 21st century, important for humanity, for the whole planet Earth is growing. In view of the above, the current question is: What is the role of particular social groups in the dissemination of sustainable pro-ecological development based on the concept of a new, green economy? Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

What are the main directions of the development of electromobility of the automotive industry?

Will the technologies of electric motors and the new generation of batteries installed in cars and other motor vehicles be developed in the scope of the main directions of development of electromobility of the automotive industry? Will the technology of hydrogen engines or other types of engines be developed as part of the development of eco-motorisation? At present, in the majority of countries, there is no financial resources for financing high-budget pro-ecological projects from public finance funds? Should new, new ecological innovations, new technological solutions in the field of renewable energy sources, new ecoelectrodes producing electricity for the needs of electromobility in the automotive industry, new generations of batteries, photovoltaic panels, energy storage and transmission stations, hydrogen and other engines, etc. be created that the production and use of electricity generated from renewable energy sources becomes profitable, that it becomes a profitable business, that electromobility will become more and more profitable, profitable, and the prices of electric cars drop significantly? If this process lasts for a long time, there may be a shortage of time to implement the necessary reforms aimed at disseminating in the global economy a model of sustainable pro-ecological development based on the concept of green economy. If this process lasts much longer than by 2030, there may not be enough time to carry out the necessary reforms to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and, consequently, the planet's warming process will accelerate considerably, this process will be irreversible and will continue to accelerate and towards the end of the 21st century century will lead to a global climate disaster that threatens the life of all humanity and most other forms of life on Earth.

In view of the above, the current question is: What are the main directions of the development of electromobility of the automotive industry?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

What are the important topics in the field: ecological innovations?

What types of eco-innovation are being developed in your country?

What kind of ecological innovations should be developed in your opinion?

How should they be finansed, whether by the industry from commercial enterprises funds, or by the state from public funds or in the framework of public-private partnership?

What types of renewable energy sources should be refined and developed through new eco-friendly innovations? What kind of scientific research dominate in the field of ecological innovations?

Please reply. I invite you to the discussion

The above discussion inspired me to the following considerations:

Should eco-innovation be one of the major determinants of globalization in the 21st century?

In my opinion, in the superwar perspective, various aspects of public safety should be developed, including economic, financial, cybernetic security, information security, data transfer, various capital factors in the international perspective, but also environmental security. Internationally operating institutions should be developed, which should improve various systems, including the above-mentioned categories, security systems operating at the international level. In this way, the world in various aspects could develop more effectively, in a balanced model, in seeking to reduce the scale of many negative societal phenomena, reduce the scale of economic stratification of different social strata, reduce the scale of international income disparities and equipping with production factors. In addition, in connection with the progressive global warming of the Earth, discussions, institutions and activities in the field of environmental protection should also be developed, including reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, improvement of waste segregation techniques, development of renewable energy sources, internationally developed eco-innovations, etc.

Should eco-innovation be one of the major determinants of globalization in the 21st century?

Please, answer, comments.

I invite you to the discussion.

Best wishes

The stone age was not ended because of shortage of stones, but because technology evolves . The same could be done now with carbon nanotubes, lightness, electrically upmost conductive replacing copper in engines .

Like dinosaures start to fly, humans must go there with exoskeletons wings trusted by smallest plastic fan propellers . Drones show the way but they are too heavy vs size. We get the materials, but apply visionnary ideas is more fashion wise, copying like thermal car to 2Tons electric car or trucks , stupid lost of time and energies ,also build rockets to go to mars , wtf

Dear Friends and Colleagues of RG Do you agree with my opinion that it is necessary to create and develop various types of ecological innovations? Do you agree with my opinion that in the context of the projected acceleration of the global warming process, humanity, in order to avoid global climate catastrophe, should change the classic economy in the 21st century to a new green economy to develop economies according to the concept of sustainable pro-ecological development, including replacing classic energy sources based on the combustion of minerals for renewable energy sources. In addition, in economic processes should be implemented as soon as possible and possibly the largest funds programs for reduction of greenhouse gases? It is also necessary to develop eco-friendly, material and energy innovations, including in the field of perfecting renewable energy technologies so that pro-ecological energy solutions are ever cheaper to implement and develop and more and more common.

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Best wishes

new tech arriving : trap forever atmospheric CO2 converting into CNT tech products. Article One-pot synthesis of nanostructured carbon materials from ca...

In the context of the above considerations, I also propose the following research problem:

What is the significance of innovative technologies in shaping pro-development, anti-crisis, counter-cyclical, Keynesian, pro-ecological socio-economic policy?

What instruments of state intervention are applied in your country as part of pro-development, anti-crisis, counter-cyclical, Keynesian, pro-ecological socio-economic policy and pro-social housing policy?

In some developing countries, pro-development, anti-crisis, countercyclical, Keynesian socio-economic policies and pro-social housing policies are currently underway, which are a significant determinant of high economic growth and provide citizens with material and economic well-being. In individual countries, analogical instruments of state intervention are usually used as part of pro-development, anti-crisis, counter-cyclical, Keynesian socio-economic policy and pro-social housing policy.

The applied state intervention instruments also contribute to the activation of innovation and entrepreneurship, reduction of unemployment, investment growth, income and consumption. In individual countries, analogical instruments of state intervention are usually used, including selected instruments of fiscal, budgetary and monetary policy, however, in a different structure of the use of individual instruments and a different share of their financing from the public finances of the state.

In my opinion, the development of innovative technologies and their implementation into the production processes of both consumer and investment products, e.g. construction prefabricates and ecological materials, energy innovations is a growing factor of pro-development, anti-crisis, countercyclical, Keynesian socio-economic policy, including pro-social development. housing policy?

In a situation where pro-ecologic innovations are also developed, including the new ones, including new technologies of renewable energy sources, then pro-development anti-crisis, Keynesian socio-economic policy acquires additional attributes of modernity taking into account the protection of natural resources of the environment.

In this situation, the classic pro-development anti-crisis, Keynesian social and economic policy is transformed into an ecological socio-economic policy implemented into the economy as part of the promotion of sustainable pro-ecological socio-economic development taking into account the new green economy principles.

Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?

In view of the above, I am asking you the following question:

What is the importance of innovative technologies in shaping pro-development, anti-crisis, counter-cyclical, Keynesian, pro-ecological socio-economic policy?

Please reply

I invite you to discussion and scientific cooperation

Thank you very much for your response and participation in the discussion

Dear Friends and Colleagues of RG

The issues of specific programs to improve the economic, financial, material and housing situation of households as key instruments of pro-development state intervention and significant components of the socio-economic policy of the state I described in the publications:

Article FAMILY 500 PLUS PROGRAMS AND FLAT PLUS WITH KEY INSTRUMENTS ...

Article Ability to Generate Financial Savings by Households in Poland

Article ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL SITUATION OF HOUSEHOLDS IN POLAND – A...

I invite you to discussion and cooperation.

Best wishes

Accordingly, I propose the following research question in this area:

Is crowdfunding used for external financing of innovative start-ups?

In my opinion crowdfunding will be intensively developed in the future as an alternative to classic forms of external financing of business ventures. This is an alternative to the financial services offered by institutions of the financial sector, especially in the segment of financing innovative start-ups. Commercial banks operating as part of the classic deposit and credit banking often avoid lending to innovative start-ups due to difficulties in assessing credit risk. In such a situation crowdfunding may be a good solution to problems with finding external financing.

Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much for your response and participation in the discussion

Best wishes

Another proposal for a research topic in this field:

Will ecological innovations help in the implementation of sustainable pro-ecological economic development?

Will ecological innovations help in speeding up the process of a globally changing civilization development strategy towards sustainable ecological and social development?

Yes, it is necessary to change the development strategy based on intensifying the exploitation of the Earth's resources on the sustainable development strategy. It is necessary to develop new energy technologies based on renewable energy sources to slow down the progressing greenhouse effect of the Earth in order to reduce the risk of dramatic natural cataclysms. It is necessary to develop ecological innovations, while it may not be too late. It is necessary to save the Earth by extinction for future generations.

The 21st century is the last moment to introduce global sustainable development based on the development of renewable energy and ecological innovations. Sustainable development should be analyzed and measured in correlation with the analysis of economic growth and the share of individual sectors in the country's economic development, including the transformation of traditional energy sources into renewable energy, environmental reclamation and recovery of recyclable materials, and ecological innovations.

Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?

In view of the above, I am asking you the following question:

Will ecological innovations help in speeding up the process of a globally changing civilization development strategy towards sustainable ecological and social development?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much for your response and participation in the discussion

Best wishes

I propose the following proposal for a research topic in this area:

How has the importance of information about innovations and technologies in production processes changed since the mid-20th century?

From the 1970s, up to three factors of classical economics (land, labor, capital) are added as equally important based on the third technological revolution resulting from the development of computer science. During this time, neoclassical trends developed, according to which classic factors (land, labor, capital) are added such as: information, innovations, patents, knowledge, technology etc. Currently in the era of the IV technological revolution based on advanced, computerized processing of large knowledge collections the importance of knowledge concerning new, innovative technologies is growing and increasingly determines the development of technological startups, other companies and corporations and affects the development of the economy of developed countries.

The current technological revolution, known as Industry 4.0, is determined by the development of the following technologies of advanced information processing:

Big Data database technologies, cloud computing, machine learning, Internet of Things, artificial intelligence, Business Intelligence and other advanced data mining technologies. The information technologies mentioned above are increasingly used in manufacturing processes, in the production processes of economic dells, in the processes of supplying products and services to the markets, which are becoming more and more technologically processed. In this way, technology becomes one of the key production factors in modern developed countries.

Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?

In view of the above, I am asking you the following question:

How has the importance of information about innovations and technologies in production processes changed since the mid-20th century?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Best wishes

What are the main barriers to the development of innovation and entrepreneurship in your country?

What are the main barriers to the development of innovation and entrepreneurship in your country and what should be improved in pro-innovation economic policy?

What should be changed in economic policy to reduce barriers to entrepreneurship and innovation?

In my country, the main barriers to innovation are high labor costs, high taxes and parapositive contributions under the public finance system.

Are these barriers to the development of innovation and entrepreneurship in your country similar or different?

Please reply

Best wishes

In addition, I suggest the following questions and research problems in the above topic:

In which fields of science and industry etc. should proecological innovations be created in order to promote sustainable pro-ecological economic development?

In which scientific disciplines, areas of contemporary economic systems, branches of industry, etc., in the 21st century, proecological innovations should be created in order to support sustainable pro-ecological economic development according to the concept of green economy?

In connection with the progressing global warming and the increase in the risk and frequency of climate disasters, it is necessary to implement pro-ecological reforms as soon as possible into economic processes. First of all, renewable energy sources should be developed, replacing the classic energy based on the burning of minerals. In addition, it is necessary to improve the technology of automation and robotization in the processes of waste segregation, recycling and re-use of various types of raw materials. Also, electromobility, ecological agriculture, zero-energy construction, etc. should be developed.

In recent years ecological innovations have been created mainly in the field of renewable energy sources, improvement of waste segregation techniques, recycling, treatment of polluted water, reclamation of a devastated natural environment, energy-efficient construction, electromobility etc. However, more and more eco-innovations, new technological solutions, technical improvements which is part of sustainable ecological development, is also created in many other fields of science.

In view of the above, are examples of pro-ecological undertakings, technological improvements compatible with sustainable ecological development or ecological innovations that are also created in one of the following or other related fields of science, for example: Molecular Biology, Biotechnology, Anthropology Theory, Medicine, Electrical Engineering , Artificial Intelligence, Genetics, Business Administration, Risk Management, Big Data, Business Intelligence, Automation & Robotics, Climatology, Agriculture, Biophysics, Biochemistry, Medical Intelligence, Artificial Neural Networks, Ecosystem Analysis, Power Engineering, Construction, Food production, Forest ecology, Biology, Geoscience, Government Programs, Behavioral Sciences, Biodiversity Assessment, Green Architecture, Greenhouse, Waste, Household Products, Information Society, Innovation Management, International Entrepreneurship, Internet Technologies, Knowledge Creation, Bioelectric Energy gy Sources, Business Model Innovation, Cataclysmic Variables, Chromatography, Clean Energy, Cleantech, Climate Prediction, Collaborative Innovation, Commercialization, Computational Intelligence, Computer Science and Engineering, Conservation Biology, Consumer Behavior, Corporate Governance, Creative Economy, Crisis Communication, Cyber Security, Data Analysis, Database Administration, Development Cooperation, Digital Ecosystems, Economic Ecoindicators, Ecosystem Ecology, Energy Industry, Ecological Modeling Ecological Economics, Ecological Indicators, Discovery, Earth Sciences, Earthquake Forecasting and Geocataclysm, Econometric Analysis, Economic Integration, Economics of Innovation, Ecosystem Engineering, Electricity, Electronic Systems, Energetic Materials, Energy Technologies, Environment, Environmental Biodegradation, Flora, Food Consumption Life Sciences, Logistics Management, Materials for Sustainable Energy, Astronomy & Astrophysics, Nanomaterials, New Media Technology, Recycling, Physics of Global Warming, Plant Protection, Predicive Analytics, Production Planning, Project Development, Public Economics, Public Policy, Public Policy, Sociobiology, Space Science, Sustainable Agriculture, Sustainable Development Strategies, Technology Forecasting, Transport Economics, Water Resources, Weather Forecasting, Wildlife Conservation, World Economy, ...?

In view of the above, the current question is:

In which scientific disciplines, areas of contemporary economic systems, branches of industry, etc., in the 21st century, proecological innovations should be created in order to support sustainable pro-ecological economic development according to the concept of green economy?

Please, answer, comments.

I invite you to the discussion.

Best wishes

Main concern is 9/11 manipulation by hidden power( tamuldism)

Second thinking out of the box otherwise you stay focused on the problem

Third plastics help a lot in every domain but must only collected to recover the energy they contain, not trying to seperate to re use in mixed poor blends( waste of energy)

Fourth , fast mobility has huge cost but not transposed in the costs life stop flying by large plane promote new tech like exoskeleton wings with air thrust (third scale to avoid traffic jams as an exemple)

Fifth, help wild nature to regenerate easier and stop use it to make business

Sixth, promote gardening , fight desertification, promote solar use and other large free energies wind , waves , geothermy, tides

Seventh, switch to electrical mobility (more efficient) with the help of lighter vehicules smaller ;promote local activities rather two hours commuting .ect

Lobbying these ideas to richst people who thinking about they legacy

Even dinosaurs flown , human not yet !!

The above question inspired me to the following considerations:

How to activate the development of ecological innovations and pro-ecological reforms in economic processes?

Ecological innovations should contribute to accelerating the process of a global change in the strategy of civilization development towards sustainable ecological and socio-economic development. In the context of increasing greenhouse gas emissions, the ongoing global warming process, growing environmental pollution and the devastation of many environments and natural ecosystems, it is necessary to stimulate the development of eco-innovation and pro-ecological reforms in economic processes to implement sustainable economic and environmental friendly socio-economic development based on green economy concept.

Yes, it is necessary to change the development strategy based on intensifying the exploitation of the Earth's resources on the sustainable development strategy. It is necessary to develop new energy technologies based on renewable energy sources to slow down the progressing greenhouse effect of the Earth in order to reduce the risk of dramatic natural cataclysms. It is necessary to develop ecological innovations, while it may not be too late. It is necessary to save the Earth by extinction for future generations.

The 21st century is the last moment to introduce global sustainable development based on the development of renewable energy and ecological innovations. Sustainable development should be analyzed and measured in correlation with the analysis of economic growth and the share of individual sectors in the country's economic development, including the transformation of traditional energy sources into renewable energy, environmental reclamation and recovery of recyclable materials, and ecological innovations.

Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?

In view of the above, I am asking you the following question:

How to activate the development of ecological innovations and pro-ecological reforms in economic processes?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

In the context of the progressive warming of the Earth's climate, the following question is of particular importance:

How can environmental protection and biodiversity be improved by using current ecological technologies?

Due to the current civilization progress in recent decades, acceleration of the development of industry, automotive, urban agglomerations, intensification of agricultural production, etc. and related greenhouse gas emissions, global warming, ozone layer depletion in the atmosphere, increase of environmental pollution, growing problem of smog in urban agglomerations, the increase in pollution of the seas and oceans to which unsorted waste is thrown away is cut out as part of the predatory economy of tropical forests in the Amazon and other largest natural forest ecosystems.

In addition, the secondary effect of global warming of the Earth's climate is the increasing, more frequent weather anomalies, including drought, leading to steppe and desertification of areas that were previously natural forest ecosystems or areas exploited by agriculture.

As a result of the above-mentioned processes, every year many species of flora and fauna disappear forever.

As a result, natural biodiversity diminishes, which for millions of years evolved evolutionally on Earth.

In this way the natural resources of the planet Earth are irretrievably in decline.

In view of the above, the issue of environmental protection and biodiversity is one of the most important challenges of humanity in the 21st century.

Classical economics must change towards a green economy based on the strategy of sustainable pro-ecological development.

Therefore, I am asking you for the following query:

How can environmental protection and biodiversity be improved by using current ecological technologies?

Please, answer, comments.

I invite you to the discussion.

Best wishes

In addition, I note the interesting discussion inspired me to the following considerations:

To what extent does the development of eco-innovations and renewable energy improve the issue of environmental protection?

To what extent does the development of eco-innovation and renewable energy improve the protection of the environment, natural biological ecosystems and biodiversity?

In my opinion, the development of innovative ecological technologies and eco-innovations as well as renewable energy sources and their implementation into economic processes is a growing important factor of sustainable green economic development based on the green economy concept.

In a situation where pro-ecological innovations are developed, including energy-related innovations, including new technologies of renewable energy sources, then pro-development anti-crisis, Keynesian socio-economic policy obtains additional attributes of modernity taking into account the protection of natural resources of the environment, protection of natural biological ecosystems and biodiversity.

In this situation, the classic pro-development anti-crisis, Keynesian social and economic policy is transformed into an ecological socio-economic policy implemented into the economy as part of the promotion of sustainable proecological socio-economic development taking into account the new green economy principles, including care for the protection of natural environmental resources, protection natural biological ecosystems and biodiversity.

Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?

In view of the above, I am asking you the following question:

To what extent does the development of eco-innovation and renewable energy improve the protection of the environment, natural biological ecosystems and biodiversity?

Please reply

I invite you to discussion and scientific cooperation

Thank you very much

Best wishes

In the context of the above considerations, the following question is also current:

What is the significance of innovative technologies in shaping pro-development, anti-crisis, Keynesian, pro-ecological socio-economic policy?

What is the significance of innovative technologies in shaping pro-development, anti-crisis, counter-cyclical, Keynesian, pro-ecological socio-economic policy?

What instruments of state intervention are applied in your country as part of pro-development, anti-crisis, counter-cyclical, Keynesian, pro-ecological socio-economic policy and pro-social housing policy?

In some developing countries, pro-development, anti-crisis, countercyclical, Keynesian socio-economic policies and pro-social housing policies are currently underway, which are a significant determinant of high economic growth and provide citizens with material and economic well-being. In individual countries, analogical instruments of state intervention are usually used as part of pro-development, anti-crisis, counter-cyclical, Keynesian socio-economic policy and pro-social housing policy.

The applied state intervention instruments also contribute to the activation of innovation and entrepreneurship, reduction of unemployment, investment growth, income and consumption. In individual countries, analogical instruments of state intervention are usually used, including selected instruments of fiscal, budgetary and monetary policy, however, in a different structure of the use of individual instruments and a different share of their financing from the public finances of the state.

In my opinion, the development of innovative technologies and their implementation into the production processes of both consumer and investment products, e.g. construction prefabricates and ecological materials, energy innovations is a growing factor of pro-development, anti-crisis, countercyclical, Keynesian socio-economic policy, including pro-social development. housing policy?

In a situation where pro-ecologic innovations are also developed, including the new ones, including new technologies of renewable energy sources, then pro-development anti-crisis, Keynesian socio-economic policy acquires additional attributes of modernity taking into account the protection of natural resources of the environment.

In this situation, the classic pro-development anti-crisis, Keynesian social and economic policy is transformed into an ecological socio-economic policy implemented into the economy as part of the promotion of sustainable pro-ecological socio-economic development taking into account the new green economy principles.

Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?

In view of the above, I am asking you the following question:

What is the importance of innovative technologies in shaping pro-development, anti-crisis, counter-cyclical, Keynesian, pro-ecological socio-economic policy?

Please reply

I invite you to discussion and scientific cooperation

Thank you very much for your response and participation in the discussion

Dear Friends and Colleagues of RG

The issues of specific programs to improve the economic, financial, material and housing situation of households as key instruments of pro-development state intervention and significant components of the socio-economic policy of the state I described in the publications:

Article FAMILY 500 PLUS PROGRAMS AND FLAT PLUS WITH KEY INSTRUMENTS ...

Article Ability to Generate Financial Savings by Households in Poland

Article ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL SITUATION OF HOUSEHOLDS IN POLAND – A...

I invite you to discussion and cooperation.

Best wishes

Dear Friends and Colleagues of RG

In the coming years, humanity should carry out pro-ecological reforms of the classic energy based on the burning of minerals by converting it into environmentally friendly energy based on renewable energy sources. It should be possible to allocate as much as possible to this environmentally-friendly transformation of the energy industry because what will be realized in this matter over the next dozen or so years depends on the pace of the progressive and accelerating process of greenhouse gas emissions and global warming. Ecological innovations developed primarily in the field of new technologies of renewable energy sources are helpful in the process of proecological energy transformation.

Best wishes

Thanks to ecological innovations, the scope and possibilities of implementing sustainable ecological development are increasing. In connection with the progressing global warming process, it is necessary to develop eco-innovations in the field of renewable energy development, improvement of sorting techniques, recycling, electromobility, organic farming, plastic reduction from packaging and conversion of plastics to biodegradable materials, etc.

In this way, through the development of eco-innovations and their implementation on an industrial scale, it is possible to implement a sustainable pro-ecological economic development in modern economies. This is a key challenge for humanity in the 21st century. It is a challenge to the necessary and possibly quick implementation in the coming years.

Best wishes

In view of the above, it is also important to include in the above discussion also the following issue:

How do ecological innovations co-create the implementation of sustainable pro-ecological economic development?

In the coming years, humanity should carry out pro-ecological reforms of the classic energy based on the burning of minerals by converting it into environmentally friendly energy based on renewable energy sources. It should be possible to allocate as much as possible to this environmentally-friendly transformation of the energy industry because what will be realized in this matter over the next dozen or so years depends on the pace of the progressive and accelerating process of greenhouse gas emissions and global warming. Ecological innovations developed primarily in the field of new technologies of renewable energy sources are helpful in the process of proecological energy transformation.

Thanks to ecological innovations, the scope and possibilities of implementing sustainable ecological development are increasing. In connection with the progressing global warming process, it is necessary to develop eco-innovations in the field of renewable energy development, improvement of sorting techniques, recycling, electromobility, organic farming, plastic reduction from packaging and conversion of plastics to biodegradable materials, etc.

In this way, through the development of ecological innovations and their implementation on an industrial scale, it is possible to implement sustainable pro-ecological economic development in modern economies. This is a key challenge for humanity in the 21st century. It is a challenge to the necessary and possibly quick implementation in the coming years.

Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?

In view of the above, I am asking you the following question:

How do ecological innovations co-create the implementation of sustainable pro-ecological economic development?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

Therefore, in the context of the above considerations, the following important question appears:

Why is the process of implementing proecological reforms in energy and other eco-innovations so slow?

Why, despite the scientifically confirmed fact that the global warming process is progressing faster and faster in many countries, so little is done in terms of necessary proecological reforms and implementation of ecological innovations and development of energy based on renewable energy sources, development of electromobility, plastic reduction from packaging, improvement of waste segregation and development recycling?

Due to the accelerating process of global warming, it is necessary to increase expenditures on the development of eco-innovations, their industrial implementation and accelerate the implementation of necessary pro-ecological reforms, first of all development of energy based on renewable energy sources, development of electromobility, plastic reduction from packaging, development of biodegradable applications materials of organic origin, improvement of waste segregation processes, development of recycling, organic farming, zero-energy construction and other key aspects of sustainable pro-ecological development carried out according to the concept of green economy, etc.

Do you agree with me on the above matter?

In the context of the above issues, I am asking you the following question:

Why is the process of implementing proecological reforms in energy and other eco-innovations so slow?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes