When man lives in one place and makes part of that ecosystem he has the right to use that space as any other animal. But tourism is most of the a predatory relationship. We should change this relationship and limit or prohibit avenues by the sea shore, lights, buildings block the wind, etc. 

Dear Deepananda,

I also saw you have some very interesting articles about this matter. Congratulations for it. You have been using your time in a very intelligent way.

You may take a look at "Contesting the Foreshore. Tourism, Society and Politics on the Coast" by J. Boissevain and T. Selwyn (2004).

I wrote a paper on this topic that may be of interest; it has a lot of relevant references as well: Fabinyi, M. 2010. The Intensification of Fishing and the Rise of Tourism: Competing Coastal Livelihoods in the Calamianes Islands, Philippines. Human Ecology 38(3): 415-427. 

Tourism may also deflect people from fisheries related jobs, and be an incentive to transform fishing boats into vessels fit for other activities (i.e. whale watching, sightseeing), diversifying income possibilities in small coastal settlements. An increase in tourism does not always mean intrusive coastal developments -I'm thinking of Iceland as an exception to the rule, but I am not familiar with literature  on this particular example.

I am conducting a couple of studies on tourism in small fishing communities... one in coastal U.S. and the other one in coastal Peru.  Preliminary results in both cases suggest that although tourism has the potential to "save" traditional fishing practices, fishermen do not benefit properly from tourism. 

I haven't read about it but experienced the change in Bali where fishermen were/are making more money from tourism than fishing, using their fishing boats to take tourists out on the ocean to see dolphins, and chase them disturbing the dolphins feeding, breeding and resting habits. There are articles written on the management of the Ningaloo whale shark tourism program in Western Australia.