Mies van der Rohe pithy aphorism: “Architecture is the will of the epoch translated into space” doesn’t seem to fit quite well with the modern IT generation, today. Often, new architectural forms and style expressions arise along with societal changes, and sometimes even crisis, which gives opportunities to people associated with building the challenges as well as the chances to new line of thoughts. For a large part, much of the celebrated architecture styles of today have its origin in the first half of the 20th century or earlier. The development of ENIAC, the first computer in the 1940s nor the widespread use of internet in the 1990s led to the evolution of architecture as a style movement or school of thoughts, spatially or symbolically. What did arrived, nevertheless, is the ‘smart office’, ‘smart cities’ or intelligent buildings that incorporates energy efficiency, safety and security, etc., through automation that integrates the control system into computers. But these technological evolutions are not really a style movement or initiation to new school of thoughts, per se. So, is it correct to say IT has little or no impact on architectural expressions or style movements? Share your thoughts.

Similar questions and discussions