I have worked as a reviewer and editor for many scientific journals for years. I discovered that many writers were unhappy during manuscript evaluation process. Most common complains are the referee's comments are insufficient, the article is not taken to the correct scientific evaluation, such as to feel unfair, etc. So what is yours? What doesn't motivate you?
Dear Zayde!
Tha author of a book, chapter or article should be very active in social media. Then more people can see and be better qualified. In addition, search is important with keywords. Many people don't like to read the publication so they can't appreciate it. It is also important to have your management on the scientific pages.Sinply enjoy the benefits of social media.
Thank you your question!
Good luck in asking for opinions.
Judit
Hi Judit Molnár
Thank you for your valuable contribution to the discussion. You're totally right about being active on social media. It looks like entertainment, but it can be useful even for scientist. Most researchers don't have a social media account, may they think it is a waste of time. However, social media can be useful for improving our research power.
See you in another discussion :)
Zayde
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Correction