The h-index was proposed by Hirsch (2005). It is defined as follows: «A scientist has h-index if h of his/her Np papers have at least h citations each, and the other (Np-h) papers have no more than h citations each»

The advantage of the h-index is that it combines an assessment of both quantity (number of papers) and quality (impact or citations to these paper) (Glänzel, 2006). Am academic cannot have a high h-index without publishing a substantial number of paper. However, these papers need to be cited by others academics in order to count for the h-index.(Anne-Will Harzing, 2011)

A disadvantage of the h-index is that it ignores the number of citations to each individual article over and above what is needed to achieve a certain h-index. Once a paper belongs to the top h papers, its subsequent citations no longer count. Hence, in order to give more weight to highly-cited articles Leo Egghe (2006) proposed the g-index.

More Ibraín Enrique Corrales-Reyes's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions