Barcroft claims that in initial learning, having learners write words (vs. undivided mental effort of memorization) significantly suppresses recall on immediate and delayed post-tests. This is supported by solid research (e.g. Second Language Research 22,4 (2006)). I feel a bit confounded since many effective learners must have used written lists through the ages, as an obvious and satisfactory strategy. Concerning Resource Depletion Output and teaching methodology, is this a critical issue, or is it just an academic caveat on the route to word learning, which in any case requires many encounters, and forms of elaboration? In other words, how should teachers heed this finding? Although he doesn't write it explicitly, Barcroft would appear not to endorse practices such as shadowing, since too much division of resources would occur, depleting vocabulary, or other aspects such as syntax.

More David Coulson's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions