Academia, research, and teaching face multiple challenges that hinder their effectiveness and impact. One of the major issues is the increasing commercialization of education, where institutions prioritize rankings, funding, and profit over genuine knowledge creation and student development. This shift often leads to publish-or-perish culture, where researchers are pressured to produce a high quantity of publications rather than focusing on meaningful, high-quality research. As a result, academic integrity is sometimes compromised, with scholars resorting to superficial research, predatory journals, or even unethical practices like plagiarism and data manipulation.

Another critical problem is the gap between research and practical application. Many academic studies remain confined to journals and conferences without making a real-world impact. Research should aim to solve contemporary societal and industrial problems, yet much of it is detached from practical concerns due to rigid theoretical frameworks or lack of interdisciplinary collaboration. Additionally, lack of funding and bureaucratic hurdles in academia slow down innovation and prevent many researchers from exploring groundbreaking ideas.

In teaching, outdated pedagogical methods and rigid curricula fail to address the diverse learning needs of students. Many education systems emphasize rote memorization and standardized testing rather than critical thinking, creativity, and problem-solving. The lack of digital adaptation in some institutions further limits students' exposure to modern skills and tools. Moreover, faculty burnout and poor work-life balance contribute to declining teaching quality, as educators are often burdened with excessive administrative duties, large class sizes, and research expectations.

Ultimately, academia needs to foster a culture of meaningful research, innovative teaching, and real-world impact. This requires reforming evaluation metrics, encouraging interdisciplinary collaboration, and balancing research with teaching responsibilities. By prioritizing quality over quantity and student learning over institutional prestige, academia can reclaim its role as a transformative force in society.

Research funding should be allocated automatically based on the number of reads or the research interest score. This would solve all the current problems. People would no longer have to make predictions about future research and could instead earn money from the research that they have actually done.

Khuplianlam Tungnung Academic research and development face several challenges, including bureaucratic red tape, inadequate funding, unethical practices like plagiarism, and workplace harassment. The pressure to publish often compromises quality, leading to an emphasis on quantity over impactful research. Additionally, outdated curricula and rigid pedagogical methods hinder innovation.

To improve, institutions must streamline administrative processes and ensure transparent funding allocation. Ethical research practices should be reinforced through strict plagiarism checks and accountability measures. Creating a safe, harassment-free environment will foster a healthier research culture. Universities should also focus on interdisciplinary collaboration and industry partnerships to enhance practical applications. Lastly, integrating emerging technologies in pedagogy can modernize teaching and improve research outcomes.

Nepotism based on academic backgroun, socio-economics may also have added signifiant issues to the ailments afflicting academia.

The absence of strong systems and hierarchy based decisions and opportunities could also be detrimental to progressive thinking. The so called ‘case by case’ thing is also often misinterpreted or even abuse in some cases. It’s hard to pin point the issue because it’s complex and involves many things.

Perhaps, admin and academic prowess should not be confused. There’s a reason why religion and politics are separated in many countries, and the logic of separation of legislative, judicial, and executive powers are segregated.

The system prevalent in Indian civil service may be good to extend to academia. Indian Educational Service like other IAS, IRS, IPS maybe good to actively involve in the administrative part in a balanced way. Professors can deal with academics, but Admin can do certain managements. Or, …