It consists of two independent bodies (one elastic and one rigid) one inside the other, separated by seismic joints, placed at the height of the bulkheads, which grow in height. The rigid shaft is extended to the ground from the upper ends of its corners with inconsistent tendons anchored at their ends, at their lower ends by ground anchoring mechanisms and at their upper ends by hydraulic anchoring and traction mechanisms. The elastic carrier has bearings (horizontal seismic insulation) and the rigid carrier has hydraulic seismic damping systems at its upper ends. How does it work.
During the earthquake, the two independent bodies collide on the seismic shock absorption joint and in this way they neutralize the seismic intensities. The rigid body individually controls the deformation of each floor so that it is always within the elastic displacement area, excluding inelastic displacements. The seismic joint increases in height so that the elastic building rocks naturally without lowering moments at the base The elastic carrier has full plasticity because no compressive stress is applied to the cross-sections of the columns except for its static loads. In the rigid body we can apply full pre-tension since it does not receive static loads. Horizontal seismic insulation reduces the transmission of ground acceleration to the construction, thus reducing the stresses, while the hydraulic system on the roof absorbs seismic energy by converting it into thermal energy, the seismic joints neutralize the seismic intensities, while the buckling mechanism transports to the ground preventing cross-sectional stress. In asymmetric non-frame constructions to stop the torsional bending of the bearing it is possible to place more than one rigid stretched and independent wall sections in suitable areas as shown in the last figure. This method ensures the absolute seismic protection (because it completely controls the deformation), the absolute view and natural lighting for architectural reasons, as well as the absolute protection of the contents of the construction from falls! The video with English speech here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IO6MxxH0lMU&fbclid=IwAR34P9lx0zrha40Q_MiC7s_doey0hBSNi1bS09RuAaPNr6piT1ATT3JeIDs
ΤΡΙΠΛΗ ΑΝΤΙΣΕΙΣΜΙΚΗ ΜΕΘΟΔΟΣ ΣΧΕΔΙΑΣΜΟΥ ΓΙΑ ΑΠΟΛΥΤΗ ΑΝΤΙΣΕΙΣΜΙΚΗ ΘΩΡΑΚΙΣΗ Αποτελείτε από δύο ανεξάρτητους φορείς ( έναν ελαστικό και έναν άκαμπτο ) ο ένας μέσα στον άλλο, τους οποίους διαχωρίζουν σεισμικοί αρμοί, τοποθετημένοι στο ύψος των διαφραγμάτων, οι οποίοι μεγαλώνουν καθ ύψος. Το άκαμπτο φρεάτιο είναι προτεταμένο με το έδαφος από τα ανώτατα άκρα των γωνιών του με τένοντες άνευ συνάφειας πακτωμένους στα άκρα τους, στα κάτω άκρα τους με μηχανισμούς αγκύρωσης εδάφους και στα επάνω άκρα τους με υδραυλικούς μηχανισμούς πάκτωσης και έλξης.Ο ελαστικός φορέας διαθέτει εφέδρανα ( οριζόντια σεισμική μόνωση ) και ο άκαμπτος φορέας διαθέτει στα ανώτατα άκρα του υδραυλικά συστήματα απόσβεσης σεισμικών εντάσεων.Πως δουλεύει.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IO6MxxH0lMU
idea is good but at the center at root can provide problems on different lithology, 1) liquid behavior of basement filling material without supports very dangerous
dynamics of base filling around root column is a good subject for mean the balance but it reasoned to sand pumping and sand hydrolics this is nice (via water or not?) after quake arrangments if via water then system need pool type holder at the hydrolic root with special water discharge (lets work it together Greece andTurkey at high quake risk always )
2) if one of S and P waves was dominant then extreme damage can be and lithology and tectonic independant considerations will cause damage even to neighbor buildings
for example when filled concrete backbone column used; it can trigger whole concrete block to up if its mass enough to pull back quick it possible collapse of all lateral structure
but filled or empty colunm type of main column design and its experiments very nice for research
i think elastic dumpers must be only supporter, not the whole weigth carrier at the corner (belong to sentence tree body similar basement support)
in time material and convenient friction lifetime is short for hydrolic structure
and direction of incoming quake waves is big problem, we must observe trees both for lateral support design and root devolopment after quakes (without harm to them)
Dear Dursun Acar. An industrial product has the same specifications. The constructions, however, differ from each other and each have different needs and different concerns.
Also..The soils are inhomogeneous due to their natural composition and have different strengths.
Also .. the mechanism with the tendon and the ground may lose their dynamics after a strong earthquake or over time.
There are also existing structures that need seismic reinforcement
There are too many unbalanced factors that can cause disaster in most modern seismic structures. Basically, the factors that determine the seismic behavior of structures are numerous, and in part probable. (The direction of the earthquake is unknown, the exact content of the seismic excitation frequencies is unknown, its duration is unknown.) Even the maximum possible accelerations given by seismologists, and determine the seismic design factor, have a probability of exceeding more than 10%. These unbalanced factors when combined all together cause large deformations in the structure which create from inelastic leakage failures to beyond their breaking point and we have the collapse of structures. According to modern regulations, the seismic design of buildings is based on the requirements of adequate design and plasticity. The inevitable inelastic behavior under strong seismic excitation is directed at selected elements and failure mechanisms. In particular, the lack of good design of the nodes and the clearly limited plasticity of the elements lead to fragile forms of failure. In short they inevitably manage failure which they cannot control because they cannot control deformation.
For all these problems that you and I have pointed out, there is applied research. I have answers for everything. I need 500 pages to analyze them. It is impossible here. I will refer you to read my research here. You will get many answers.
Preprint DYNAMICS OF CONSTRUCTIONS RESEARCH
i agree with you ,thank you for your efforts for start to meaninful scientific discussion for everybody , and your discussion helping to increase human knowledge. i will read your research
i read , your invention explainable shortly as
dual base anchor lock mechanism , without big soil mass excavating
good idea for hold the inter brick walls and keep the whole house at the soft sediments or soil like a strong tooth at the jawbone
but you need the try it at the ground liquifection conditions i think it is practical on shake table here we can help you about analog modeling (we think about some shapes of concrete column root as spheric etc which needs big mass of soil excavation ; we can apply your steel mechanism in the analog experiments as model four . what is your idea about it )
secondly about environmental point : soil is most important mine in the earth for all livings some misunderstandings by other appliers can be a reason for soil damage
Dear Dursun Acar.
1) If the anchoring mechanism is placed in a continuous brickwork construction (without columns) it keeps the consistency of the bricks. 2) If the anchoring mechanism is placed on all the sides of the reinforced concrete walls by connecting with partial pre-tension.. using tendons without relevance, joining their upper end and the ground together ... then we stop ....
a) the overturning of the wall.
b) the bending of its trunk.
c) the critical area of shear failure. d) The torques at the nodes.
e) returns deflects seismic forces into the ground Basically we stop the deformation of the building and in this way we stop the failure. The ground mechanism successfully receives up and down loads on both soft and rocky soils
If the soil is liquefied then go drilling deeper. I will be very happy if we work together. I can tell you different methods of anchoring in the soil. The mechanism can break the world ground anchor record. If we collaborate research I will tell you a lot of the research I have done. I will be very happy to do it in practice Yes I want the mechanism to be used in analog experiments by you!
Earthquake is a natural periodic event that destroys lives and property. It does not matter when it happens, since it does happen. The science of civil engineering around the world tries to keep constructions upright. To achieve this it tries to bring in opposition to the seismic forces of the earthquake opposing forces coming from the construction. It is understood and accepted by all that any force that resists the force of an earthquake is desirable because we all know from physics that equal and opposite forces balance. I make a suggestion to those who write the anti-seismic regulations, and for some unknown reason they do not listen to me. For the first time in the world, I propose that this force that resists earthquakes should not only come from the dynamics of construction but also from an external factor, that of the ground. This external force can by itself balance the forces of the earthquake or work with the forces of construction to balance the forces of the earthquake together.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Computer Science and Engineering
- Computer Graphics and Animation
- 3D