Dear Ibrahim Garba

In the field of toxic leadership, ethical considerations become particularly complex when the research concerns the author directly and there is no external subject of study. In such cases, the author must navigate the delicate balance between self-reflection and objectivity. Ethical research practices demand transparency, honesty, and a commitment to avoiding bias, even when the subject matter is deeply personal. The author must critically assess their own experiences and behaviors, ensuring that the research does not become a platform for self-justification or vindication. This requires a rigorous adherence to methodological standards, such as triangulating personal insights with existing literature or theoretical frameworks, to maintain credibility and academic integrity.

Additionally, the ethical implications extend to how the research is presented and its potential impact on others. Even without external subjects, the findings could influence perceptions of leadership, organizational culture, or interpersonal dynamics. The author must consider the broader consequences of their work, ensuring it contributes constructively to the field rather than perpetuating harmful stereotypes or practices. Confidentiality and anonymity, though not applicable in the traditional sense, still play a role in protecting any individuals indirectly referenced or implicated in the research. Ultimately, the ethical responsibility lies in producing work that is both personally insightful and universally valuable, advancing understanding of toxic leadership without compromising ethical standards.

I hope this helps.

Hello Félix Oscar Socorro Márquez

Thank you for your considerate and very insightful response.

I will comb through it and get back to you. I have seen a lot of interesting ideas which also agree with mine in your response.

Once again, my gratitude.

Ibrahim

Ibrahim Garba

When researching toxic leadership within management education, especially in cases where the author is directly implicated or drawing from personal experience, ethical considerations become critical. One major concern is maintaining objectivity and avoiding the risk of bias or self-vindication. Researchers must practice reflexivity—openly acknowledging their positionality and potential conflicts of interest—and consider how their narrative may shape the interpretation of findings.

Another ethical aspect involves transparency in methodology and intent. If the research lacks traditional subjects, the inquiry should be positioned more as an autoethnographic or reflective case study. In such contexts, ethical integrity lies in honesty, methodological rigor, and clear delineation between subjective experiences and broader theoretical insights. Ensuring the work contributes constructively to the field, rather than serving personal grievances, helps maintain scholarly value and ethical standing.

Lastly, the researcher must consider the potential impact on institutions, colleagues, or students indirectly involved. Even if individuals are not named, care should be taken to anonymize details and avoid harm. Institutional review boards or ethics committees can offer guidance, even for reflective studies, to safeguard ethical research practices and uphold professional responsibility in such sensitive topics.

Kwan Hong Tan , thank you very much for your response.

I agree with using the autoethnographic approach. I will look into the other aspects you highlighted.

Best wishes,

Ibrahim

Ibrahim Garba

It's my pleasure. Let me know if I can be of assistance.