I like to follow research in my field of interest, and sometimes I'm amazed at the contradictions between similar concepts already presented by colleagues in the same field. Do people lose interest in the work of others, or do they simply not read the work of their colleagues? Me thinking out loud;-).
Stella, I am happy to support that my work on psychiatry has garnered interest from people going over the same concerns, so ideas and evidence are exchanged.
Stanley Wilkin Thank you very much! It's encouraging to hear that your work in psychiatry has sparked interest and facilitated the exchange of ideas - that's really great, you're so lucky;-). It's proof that research can build bridges between scientists, even across different disciplines. I would agree that discussion and collaboration are essential to deepen our understanding, especially of complex issues. However, I am still fascinated by how, despite this exchange, contradictions sometimes arise within similar concepts. Perhaps that's a natural consequence of different perspectives or evolving knowledge. What do you think? Anyway, it's exciting to see the constant flow of new knowledge, and I think it challenges us all to think critically and stay engaged with our colleagues' work. Thank you again for your response.
I am still fascinated by how, despite this exchange, contradictions sometimes arise within similar concepts. Perhaps that's a natural consequence of different perspectives or evolving knowledge.
STELLA, what did you have in mind?
Stanley Wilkin Well, that's a good question! I sometimes wonder if the contradictions I see are because researchers are so wrapped up in their own work that they don't have much time to look at everyone else's ideas. After all, with deadlines and pressure to produce, reading so many papers in the field can feel like an exhausting task - unless, of course, you're looking for that particular nugget of information! Perhaps these contradictions are a natural consequence of working in parallel rather than in concert. It's a bit like running on different tracks, all heading towards the same finish line, but with slightly different perspectives on the path! This is actually what I was thinking about in relation to this question. And, perhaps implicitly, the reassurance that I'm not the only one following the trends, reading so much but getting little out of it - not getting intellectually stimulated, at least not enough to buy new research. Crazy, isn't it? That's what I had in Mind Stanley.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Social Science
- Media
- Journalism