The very simple answer to your question is that the flares, produced by particle accelerations and collisions, occur prior to their entering the event horizon. Also, at least some of the ingested material, disintegrated into high energy fundamental particles, is ejected through the relativistic polar jets and never reach the event horizon. I suspect that the mass-energy of these disintegrated particles may be retained within the event horizon, however, contributing to black hole mass without increasing dimensional occupancy requirements of any singularity...

Time cannot freeze because it doesn't exist spontaneously. Consequently, time must be always of something.

Only the inherent time of the object "freezes" but not its movement in space, which results thus in the speed of light.

But motion is one of synonyms of time. First something must “freeze” then its time is “frozen”.

You are absolutely right. But special relativity theory assumes that time and space can be in some way transformed in each other. If something accelerates up to light speed in space, its inherent time will go slower until it stops when light speed is achieved. According SRT this is only an effect which can be observed by a resting observer, not by the fast moving system itself.

QIT delivers a more understandable and real picture, since the inherent time is linked to the movement of the quarks of a body and the quarks are also responsible for the movement in space, since they are always at the speed of light. Thus the faster a quark system moves in space, the slower the quarks will move against each other and therefore the rate of interaction between them decreases and so the inherent time of the quark system.

I hope this clarifies the question a little more.

Relativity theory is false. I do not recognize such a concept as space-time. It's just space. Time cannot move. Time of something is always real and no observer has no effect on the time of something unless can hypnotize something.

QIT must give a false picture, because time (of something) cannot be linked to the movement (of something) as both notions are synonyms. Btw I don't like Standard Model. Quarks (if they really exist) have nothing to do with motion (of something) in space. Any physical entities have its velocity and it means that their times are resulting, i.e. “t “ is dependent on “v” and “s” of any form matter thus inherence of time in matter is non-existent.

OK in general, a theory can be only self-consistent or not, and if it is self-consistent it furthermore can be useful or not. False or wrong would implizit the perfect knowledge, which cannot be achieved by any human beeing, since everybody has only limited possibilities for experieces of any kind.

In my opinion SRT is only appropriate for calculating relativistic effects within a dominant space-time like in the adjacency of the great mass of earth (thi expression of "space-time" referes to the conjunction of space and time regarding a movement, since it is only possible to move while time evolves - for an observer). E.g. without SRT & GRT we could have never been able to have a positioning system like GPS. But QIT shows the very limits of SRT & GRT.

As you say yourself time and space are connected to each other by movements - but they are not synonyms, since you can stay in space but time advances! Apart from that, QIT quarks are not the standard model ones - but this is explained in detail in the work I have uploaded - unfortunately only in German language so far.

I hope you feel more comfortable now with my distinctions.

"OK in general, a theory can be only self-consistent or not, and if it is self-consistent it furthermore can be useful or not. False or wrong would implizit the perfect knowledge, which cannot be achieved by any human beeing, since everybody has only limited possibilities for experieces of any kind."

We can evaluate theories and hypotheses and eliminate them as well. Some of them can be probable and some untrue. In case of relativity there is number of ways to refute it.

“In my opinion SRT is only appropriate for calculating relativistic effects within a dominant space-time like in the adjacency of the great mass of earth (thi expression of "space-time" referes to the conjunction of space and time regarding a movement, since it is only possible to move while time evolves - for an observer). E.g. without SRT & GRT we could have never been able to have a positioning system like GPS. But QIT shows the very limits of SRT & GRT.”

GPS has nothing to do with relativity. It's just physics. Correction of clock (not time). If we say “correction of time”, it's obviously colloquialisms. By the way one of my friends elaborated two methods allowing to get rid of GPS and tell if we are moving, in what direction, and with what velocity, without need any reference frame. I'll revert to this matter soon (when it's translated to English).

“As you say yourself time and space are connected to each other by movements”

I didn't say that. On the contrary, time (of something) has nothing to do with space. But matter, of course, is moving in it.

“- but they are not synonyms, since you can stay in space but time advances!”

No way. Time (mathematical notation) doesn't move. Autonomously doesn't exist. But metabolic processes are present in any organism, hence illusion that time goes by. I explained it in my article http://www.eioba.com/a/33e7/why-time-cannot-dilate

“Apart from that, QIT quarks are not the standard model ones - but this is explained in detail in the work I have uploaded - unfortunately only in German language so far.”

On http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model it's shown that quarks belong to standard model. But of course Wikipedia cannot be fully reliable source of information. One of my colleagues has some different view on quarks: http://www.jjanson2004.republika.pl but I am not much convinced if it reflects reality either. As to standard model, I doubt, e.g. if there exist gluons. The only one glue that keeps particles together is magnetic field. Nothing else. But it's deviation from the main topic of course.

These is frozen star (frozar) treatment of collapsed objects.

See the discussion http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&discussionID=175477793&gid=3091009&commentID=100079472&trk=view_disc&ut=1hUeCZBThExRs1

The very simple answer to your question is that the flares, produced by particle accelerations and collisions, occur prior to their entering the event horizon. Also, at least some of the ingested material, disintegrated into high energy fundamental particles, is ejected through the relativistic polar jets and never reach the event horizon. I suspect that the mass-energy of these disintegrated particles may be retained within the event horizon, however, contributing to black hole mass without increasing dimensional occupancy requirements of any singularity...

You are right time cannot move,same as space,space and time can not move.it is different for different observers in different frame of reference.

@Georg Gesek

As I promised earlier

"...one of my friends elaborated two methods allowing to get rid of GPS and tell if we are moving, in what direction, and with what velocity, without need any reference frame. I'll revert to this matter soon (when it's translated to English)."

And here is his website, but sorry for poor English.

http://tesla2.blogspot.co.uk

Andrzej:

You're wrong about time...as usual.

" I do not recognize such a concept as space-time. It's just space."

"“In my opinion SRT is only appropriate for calculating relativistic effects within a dominant space-time"

I love how time deniers like you always trip themselves up with inconsistent and self-contradictory jargon.