Dear Dr. Delgado

Your proposals seem to be extremely sophisticated and substantially above the current level of science.

But in order to really reach that level and to become capable to be effective on that level a lot of basic work is required.

Thanks Wolfgang Konle

Research Proposal Gravitationally Induced Electromagnetic Dephasing as a Poten...

🌀 Could Gravitationally-Induced EM Dephasing Resolve Black Hole Information Loss?

Dr. Dario Delgado – Theoretical Physics Outlook

In my earlier work on gravitationally induced electromagnetic (EM) dephasing, I proposed that spacetime curvature—even from small gravitational gradients—can cause measurable phase shifts in electromagnetic fields. This idea, initially tested in orbital conditions and later applied to muonic hydrogen, predicted an energy shift (~6.6 μeV) consistent with the experimental anomaly known as the proton radius puzzle.

What began as an atomic-scale hypothesis may now have cosmological implications.

🔭 From Atomic Orbits to Black Hole Horizons

In general relativity, spacetime is curved not by mass alone, but by energy and momentum as described by the stress-energy tensor. In my framework, what I refer to as a "gravitational gradient" is in practice a gradient in energy density — such as the intense electromagnetic energy in tightly bound systems like muonic hydrogen.

This raises a new question: What happens to EM coherence near extreme curvature zones, such as the event horizon of a black hole?

If such curvature causes measurable dephasing in atoms, could it also explain what happens to information in black holes?

🕳️ Aligning with Hawking's Picture

Stephen Hawking showed that black holes radiate — but the radiation appears thermal, suggesting information loss. This leads to the well-known black hole information paradox.

However, in my model, information may not be lost, but rather phase-shifted. Gravitational curvature near the horizon could distort EM fields, preserving quantum information in a delayed or altered form rather than destroying it outright.

Where Hawking proposed thermal radiation from field fluctuations, I propose that the same spacetime curvature could induce coherent phase distortions, embedding information non-destructively.

🚀 The Road Ahead

This opens a new direction:

• Could gravitationally induced EM phase shifts near horizons be modeled as unitary distortions, not loss?
• Could information be stored or scrambled through dephased but coherent radiation?
• Might this framework link to holographic principles or delayed recovery mechanisms?

🧠 Summary

The same effect that explains energy-level anomalies in muonic hydrogen may offer a pathway to resolving the black hole information paradox — not by rejecting general relativity or quantum mechanics, but by embracing how spacetime curvature modulates the coherence of information carriers like photons.

Information might not fall into oblivion. It might just echo back, bent in phase.

This opens the door to a new class of phase-based quantum gravity research — one where black holes don’t erase information… they rephrase it.

🌌 Einstein’s Eclipse Test (1919) and Light Bending

Einstein predicted — and Eddington’s expedition confirmed — that light rays bend around massive objects due to spacetime curvature. This bending is a geometric effect:

• The path of the photon follows a geodesic in curved spacetime.
• The gravitational field affects the trajectory of light.

But that experiment did not probe:

• Whether the electromagnetic wave itself — its internal phase, coherence, or energy structure — is altered while moving through the gravitational field.

🔬 My Insight: A Missing Component

I am saying:

The 1919 test measured the geometric deviation (bending), but not the energetic or quantum phase interaction between gravity and the EM field.

Exactly. And that opens up a second layer of gravitational interaction with light:

Two Components of Gravity–Light Interaction:

In Einstein’s 1919 eclipse experiment, the deflection of starlight passing near the Sun was measured, confirming that gravity bends light — a key prediction of general relativity. This bending reflects how gravity curves spacetime, causing light to follow geodesics. However, what wasn’t measured then — and still largely unexplored — is whether the electromagnetic wave itself experiences a gravitationally induced phase shift or energy correction as it travels through a gravitational field.

In other words, there are two distinct aspects of how gravity could interact with light:

• The first is the well-known geometric path bending — a classical effect due to spacetime curvature, which was confirmed in 1919.
• The second, which remains untested, is a quantum or semi-classical phase effect — where the internal phase or energy of the EM wave shifts due to gravitational energy density gradients.

My work focuses on this second effect — proposing that gravity doesn’t just guide the path of light, but also subtly alters its internal quantum properties. This could have measurable consequences, such as in the Lamb shift anomaly of muonic hydrogen or in high-precision satellite EM systems — offering a new window into how gravity might interact with quantum fields.

✅ What My Model Adds

I am hypothesizing that:

• Even without trajectory deflection, EM waves experience gravitationally induced phase shifts, due to interaction with gravitational energy density gradients.
• This is a non-geodesic effect — it impacts the field behavior, not just the photon path.
• It would affect interference patterns, coherence, and energy levels — measurable in atomic systems or precise interferometry (e.g. muonic hydrogen or satellite clocks).

This would be a second-order gravity–light interaction, not captured by general relativity alone — and not tested in 1919 or in LIGO, which focuses on spacetime distortion.

🔭 Implication

If my model is correct:

• Einstein’s prediction was only part of the story.
• Gravity not only bends light paths, but modulates the internal phase evolution of EM waves, especially in regions of high gravitational energy density curvature.
• The lack of phase shift measurement during eclipse tests means an entire component of gravity–EM coupling remains experimentally open.

🚀 Summary of My Insight:

The 1919 light bending experiment confirmed geodesic curvature. But if gravitational energy density gradients couple to EM phase, there is a second, unmeasured effect — one affecting quantum coherence and energy — that my model reveals.

🧠 Could Our Understanding of Dark Matter Be a Measurement Illusion? 🌌

Recent discussions around gravitationally induced electromagnetic (EM) dephasing raise a fascinating possibility: could our spectroscopic measurements — the very methods we use to infer dark matter — be subtly biased by this effect? If gravitational energy density gradients cause tiny phase shifts in our EM probes, it could lead to systematic errors in how we estimate mass distributions in the universe.

This raises a provocative question: are we overestimating the amount of dark matter because of this subtle measurement bias? Or could it even hint that what we perceive as dark matter is partly an illusion created by our measurement tools?

While dark matter has robust evidence from multiple observations, considering the possibility of a systematic bias in our methods could refine our understanding of the universe’s true mass distribution — or even reshape the dark matter paradigm.

What do you think? Could gravitationally induced EM dephasing be the missing piece in our cosmic puzzle? 🤔

Dario Delgado "What do you think? Could gravitationally induced EM dephasing be the missing piece in our cosmic puzzle?"

There is an omnipresent medium with an energy density of more than 4.0E+31J/m³. This medium compensates for the negative energy density contained in gravitational fields.

But it is precisely this kind of energy density that is emitted by stars in the form of microscopic gravitational waves with considerable power. This emission causes an energy density gradient that has an unexpected gravitational effect. This gravitational effect is wrongly interpreted as the presence of dark matter.

Dark matter is just a chimera!

Thanks Wolfgang Konle

Greetings

If its not a trouble pls send me a private email to

[email protected]

I have a preprint in Standard Model which I want to discuss and possibly modify

General idea is posted on

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Standard_Model_mathematical_classification?_ec=topicPostOverviewAuthoredQuestions&_sg=T61C7dYvPE9Aji5EUwbKad1vMk0wRKsqkypAftI0Q3qOyH_l5ocNPqsFt_N_N5TWndzI_j7RlVrsEMDy&_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7ImZpcnN0UGFnZSI6InByb2ZpbGUiLCJwYWdlIjoicXVlc3Rpb25PdmVydmlldyIsInByZXZpb3VzUGFnZSI6InByb2ZpbGUiLCJwb3NpdGlvbiI6InBhZ2VDb250ZW50In19

Look forward to hear

Ruslan Pozinkevych Thanks for your email. Could you please tell me what kind of help you are after, conceptual I can, now math, hmm.

Thanks for responding

I can send you the preprint If you like you can show it to physicists or mathematicians at your institute What is missing there allegedly is more calculations but maybe not Perhaps more data or comparison in any case Im not attaching it to the chat If interested pls send the contact email pls Thanks

P.S It can be a good contribution to a book journal etc. In essense its complete but it will take me months to publish it in a reputable journal

I am sorry, I am no longer in academia, I am elsewhere. Best of luck. :-)

Ruslan Pozinkevych

🔧 Erratum / Clarification Note – On the Role of Altitude in EMG Dephasing and the Muonic Hydrogen Puzzle

In the original preprint “Gravitationally Induced Electromagnetic Dephasing as a Potential Explanation for the Proton Radius Puzzle in Muonic Hydrogen”, I suggested that altitude-based experiments might be used to test the dephasing effects attributed to gravitational gradients. Upon further consideration and ongoing theoretical refinement, I now believe that altitude alone does not play a direct role in the observed discrepancy.

Instead, the proposed dephasing mechanism should be understood in terms of localized energy density (as it affects the Einstein tensor and EM field interaction) rather than gravitational potential energy as a function of height. In this framework, the muonic hydrogen anomaly arises primarily from high local field intensities interacting with spacetime curvature—not from elevation-dependent gravitational differences.

This correction does not invalidate the central hypothesis of EM-G coupling leading to dephasing and a corrected Lamb shift energy, but it refines the testability and interpretation of the proposed mechanism. Experiments based on muonic atoms in varying matter-density or energy-density environments (rather than gravitational potential differences at various altitudes) are now seen as more appropriate paths for validation.

I appreciate feedback and ongoing discussion, and will reflect this change in any follow-up papers or patents.

— Dr. Dario A. Delgado

A worked out solution of the Muonic Hydrogen Puzzle. https://chatgpt.com/canvas/shared/684fdcdcfbf88191b614317b9caaa5d0

🧠 Spectroscopic Biases from Muonic Hydrogen Discrepancies: Implications for Cosmology

Recent analysis of the ~6.6 μeV energy shift in the Lamb shift of muonic hydrogen suggests a possible curvature-coupled correction to electromagnetic field behavior. If this discrepancy arises from a fundamental interaction — such as a term of the Ricci Scalar–Electromagnetic Field Coupling — it may indicate that high-precision spectroscopy is subtly affected by gravitational curvature.

As many cosmological parameters (e.g. dark matter density, dark energy, and the Hubble constant) rely on spectroscopic inference, such a coupling could introduce systematic biases. This raises the possibility that our current understanding of the universe’s composition and expansion may be slightly miscalibrated due to overlooked curvature-induced electromagnetic dephasing effects.

🔗 Follow-up work explores how this framework could refine or reinterpret cosmological observations. Feedback welcome.

On Alcubierre's warp drive: https://chatgpt.com/canvas/shared/687311cd8ba881919450a3fe37590437

Sorry I have stopped following this discussion