But what if the neglected result is Einstein’s own, being confirmed by quantum mechanics soon after as he could not know in 1911, so he reluctantly gave up?

This is just cute historical story-telling. For published results, no matter how revolutionary, have no effect if they remain without resonance. The fact that one of them can save the planet at the last minute makes hereby no difference.

For the record: the result in question is called c-global – the proven-true return to the less than 32 years old Einstein.

Hence good bye, everyone: go on betting the planet on the collective superstition of the Big Bang healed by c-global for a decade. Fritz Zwicky’s sarcasm could have saved everyone 89 years ago. This most honorable scientist was proven true since by cryodynamics.

Minipaper. Dedicated to Nobel laureate Riccardo Giacconi, discoverer of the ultra-distant ultra-faint X-ray point sources whose X-ray satellites got closed down to protect the Big Bang.

February 1st, 2018

More Otto E. Rossler's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions