Meditation practices from India have attracted the interest of experimental neuroscience for many decades, with very interesting but also controversial and sometimes contradictory results. The leaders in these practices, like the Dalay Lama, have indicated their anti-dogmatism in relation to any (extra)ordinary claim of these practices. Have these occidental studies of meditation rescue appropriately the original Indian techniques ?

Some researchers indicate that the results of these studies should not be misconstrued as therapeutic effects. They should not be taken as evidence for truly therapeutic effectiveness...Recent results suggest that there is not clear positive effects on mindful breath awareness practice, for instance (Schöne B, Gruber T, Graetz S, Bernhof M, Malinowski P 2018 "Mindful breath awareness meditation facilitates efficiency gains in brain networks: A steady-state visually evoked potentials study" Sci Rep. Sep 12;8(1):13687. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32046-5).

If there are important issues in this remarkable and ancient introspective effort of India, what should be the correct way to study meditation by neuroscientists?

More Juan Fernando Gomez-Molina's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions