Jaime, I think the best question is: The Seismology studies could indicate where you should look World's Biggest Diamonds? due that "seismic" are more related with Seismic Prospecting Method, e.g., E&P.

Best wishes,

Mario E. Sigismondi

Yes Mario....!!!

Thanks

The Seismology studies could indicate where you should look World's Biggest Diamonds?

The Seismology studies could indicate where you should look World's Biggest Diamonds? With the thought that every cause produces its consequence, It is understood that nothing should be random. When using the model TX2011 (http://ds.iris.edu/) it was found that in regions of Archon Lithosphere, each region may have particular behavior (100 to 300 km depth) that is believed to be due to its individual preterite history.

If the proposal of Evan M. Smith and his collaborators was real; about him

Deep Origin of the World's Biggest Diamonds, this should show a something in deep mantle regions. The 1D seismic model TX2011

It suggests that between the 525 km at 650 km of depth kimberlites type International, Diavik, etc. (where no large diamonds were reported) depict a different path to the kimberlites/areas with mega-stones diamond (Cullinan, Lesotho, Karowe, Koidu, etc.) The Cullinan-road.

You are standing with your project about something like that? or just placed because if neighbor he has it I should also have it?

The Seismology studies could indicate where you should look World's Biggest Diamonds? With the thought that every cause produces its consequence, It is understood that nothing should be random. When using the model TX2011 (http://ds.iris.edu/) it was found that in regions of Archon Lithosphere, each region may have particular behavior (100 to 300 km depth) that is believed to be due to its individual preterite history.

If the proposal of Evan M. Smith and his collaborators was real; about him

Deep Origin of the World's Biggest Diamonds, this should show a something in deep mantle regions. The 1D seismic model TX2011

It suggests that between the 525 km at 650 km of depth kimberlites type International, Diavik, etc. (where no large diamonds were reported) depict a different path to the kimberlites/areas with mega-stones diamond (Cullinan, Lesotho, Karowe, Koidu, etc.) The Diavik-road.....without World's Biggest Diamonds trunk !!!

According to the Seismology studies ,

the area with abundant World's Biggest Diamonds in Brazil

corresponds to a lithosphere of the Proton-Tecton type.

So poor or free for truly economical diamond grade in the kimberlites. And then what is it that makes these diamond pegmatoids?

Again:

With the thought that every cause produces its consequence, It is understood that nothing should be random. When using the model TX2011 (http://ds.iris.edu/) it was found that in regions of Archon Lithosphere, each region may have particular behavior (100 to 300 km depth) that is believed to be due to its individual preterite history.

If the proposal of Evan M. Smith and his collaborators was real; about him

Deep Origin of the World's Biggest Diamonds, this should show a something in deep mantle regions. The 1D seismic model TX2011

It suggests that between the 525 km at 650 km of depth kimberlites type International, Diavik, etc. (where no large diamonds were reported) depict a different path to the kimberlites/areas with mega-stones diamond (Cullinan, Lesotho, Karowe, Koidu, etc.) The Presidente Vargas Diamond (726 ct)-road.

Lulo in Angola and its large alluvial diamonds

According to the Seismology studies ,

the area with abundant World's Biggest Diamonds in Lulo (Angola)

corresponds to a lithosphere of the Proton type.

So with low diamond grade in the kimberlites (below/near 50 cpht).

What is it that makes Lulo have these diamond pegmatoids?

Again:

With the thought that every cause produces its consequence, It is understood that nothing should be random. When using the model TX2011 (http://ds.iris.edu/) it was found that in regions of Archon Lithosphere, each region may have particular behavior (100 to 300 km depth) that is believed to be due to its individual preterite history.

If the proposal of Evan M. Smith and his collaborators was real; about him

Deep Origin of the World's Biggest Diamonds, this should show a something in deep mantle regions. The 1D seismic model TX2011

It suggests that between the 525 km at 650 km of depth kimberlites type International, Diavik, etc. (where no large diamonds were reported) depict a different path to the kimberlites/areas with mega-stones diamond (Cullinan, Lesotho, Karowe, Koidu, etc.) 

The Lulo Diamonds (400 ct)-road -not very marked but defined !!!.

The fraud of The Incomparable Diamond?

Look what about the The Incomparable diamond (rough as 890 ct) shows in 1D TX 2011 Model seismic, he does not show the trunk of giant diamonds he was really found in Mbuji-Maji, or was it a picardy?, smuggled in from South Africa?

All the super deep diamonds giants diamonds of "Evan M. Smith and his collaborators", even those from Juina (Brazil) one can define this trunk .....

See how are the great diamonds of India and if they do not describe the same path the Cullinan-road.

Could it be possible that "pirates" were already filling their pockets with large diamonds from South Africa ... making them up as being from India?

For yes or no, better insure your life as an investor and go for it from: South Africa, Botswana, Sierra Leone, Brazil, Paraguay.

For remember you:

With the thought that every cause produces its consequence, It is understood that nothing should be random. When using the model TX2011 (http://ds.iris.edu/) it was found that in regions of Archon Lithosphere, each region may have particular behavior (100 to 300 km depth) that is believed to be due to its individual preterite history.

If the proposal of Evan M. Smith and his collaborators was real; about him

Deep Origin of the World's Biggest Diamonds, this should show a something in deep mantle regions. The 1D seismic model TX2011

It suggests that between the 525 km at 650 km of depth kimberlites type International, Diavik, etc. (where no large diamonds were reported) depict a different path to the kimberlites/areas with mega-stones diamond (Cullinan, Lesotho, Karowe, Koidu, etc.).

The Path of Capiibary (Paraguay) diamonds.

In 2010 a twenty of diamonds were studied, they between 1 to 2 mm. Current diamonds !!!, but between them 1 colorless very clean of almost 2 mm (the largest). This turning out to be a type II diamond (Smith et al., 2010); diamond that marks a different route to the others analyzed (brown, green and yellow). The figure with the photo CL shows a center that seems to contain plastic deformation lamellae - like current seal of very deep to super deep diamonds.

The seismic tomography describes a behavior typically of Archon lithosphere (high speed between 100 to 175 km) and leaves very well draws the "World's Biggest Diamonds trunk" of the diamonds (yellow box) between 525 to 650 km depth. And it would seem that the same would happen between the 250 and 325 km depth (yellow box in broken lines) ?

Now let's talk about Juina, Brazil: the super deep diamonds. The studies seem to be supported by seismic 1D (see also the seismic tomography) according to the parameters already discussed: the model TX2011. Juina apparently on the border of the Archon lithosphere of the Amazonian craton. The depth of the trunk of the World's Biggest Diamonds (In 2010, a diamond garmipero of Juina, showed a blue-water diamond of more than 10 cm X 3 to 5 mm extracted from Juina diamonds placers) and super deep diamonds, its base goes beyond the 800 km depth, which is being said by different works published on inclusions about the Juina diamonds. What has been presented, to conclude, probably will have to revolutionize the concepts of plate tectonics, the geologist prospector of targets for diamond should be one that is immersed in the information of the geophysics of the mantle ....... rather than submerging in bottles of beer, wine etc. that seduce you with fantasies that consider brilliant !!! Two times of the time:

1. The discovery of super deep diamonds in the Sao Luis river of de Juina.

2 The discovery about mega diamonds (World's Biggest Diamonds signature) of Evan M. Smith and his collaborators. There is no longer an event with fantasies, and everything easy came to light ...It's time for more effort with the support of technology.

The photo (somewhat modified) is of a Juina diamond (CL) from the work of Thompson et al.