Any infection initially activates a nonspecific innate immune response, where the white blood cells lead to inflammation, and this may be enough to eliminate the virus. But in long-term infections, the adaptive immune system is activated, as T and B cells recognize the antigens derived from the virus, and T cells can detect and kill infected cells, while B cells produce antibodies that neutralize the virus. During primary infection - that is, the first time a person is infected with a specific virus - this adaptive immune response is delayed, as it takes a few days before immune cells that recognize the specific pathogen are activated and expanded to control the infection. Some of these T cells and B cells, called memory cells, persist for a long time after the infection has resolved, and these memory cells are essential for long-term protection, and in the event of subsequent infection with the virus itself, the memory cells are rapidly activated and stimulate a strong and specific response to prevent infection. Two recent studies confirmed that people previously infected with -CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, can become infected with the virus again, and it is interesting that the results of the two people are different, as the first person was in Hong Kong and did not show any symptoms when he was infected. For the second time, while the other case of an American person, the disease was more severe on him when he was infected a second time, so it is unclear whether the immune response to -CoV-2 will protect against infection again. So, does this mean that the vaccine will also fail to protect against the virus? Does the "vaccine" provide better immunity than the actual infection?

All comments and contributions are welcome.

More Manal Hadi Kanaan's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions