Hello!

This a special question to the naval architects / shipbuilders.

Looking for some tentative estimations of the possible increase of the cost of the vessel built in accordance to be able to operate in the Arctic/Sub-Arctic in comparison to the vessel of the same dimensions/purpose intended for use in the moderate conditions and having no “winterization package”. What could be the cost differences between these two vessels?

I’ve heard about “+30% of cost”, need clarification of this estimation.

Thanks in advance for possible discussion and your opinions.

Best regards,

Igor Buzin

More Igor Vladimirovich Buzin's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions