Hello!
This a special question to the naval architects / shipbuilders.
Looking for some tentative estimations of the possible increase of the cost of the vessel built in accordance to be able to operate in the Arctic/Sub-Arctic in comparison to the vessel of the same dimensions/purpose intended for use in the moderate conditions and having no “winterization package”. What could be the cost differences between these two vessels?
I’ve heard about “+30% of cost”, need clarification of this estimation.
Thanks in advance for possible discussion and your opinions.
Best regards,
Igor Buzin