In global events in last 200 years it is clearly seen Armies are not kept to defend nations and countries but their politicians and carry out their agenda .Armies on opposite sides fight for their political powers not for boundaries or public. All this is at huge cost of poor tax payers who think armies are for their welfare. Not only they are best paid with freebies , they serve their masters not public
WE can see this eevry where russia germany Ukraine USA India pakistan Nepal Sri lanka
Politicians have built their own world in nexus with rich looters everywhere and there is big gap . Like politicians living in a super luxurious world in heavens while citizens trot on earth like insects and are crashed regularly in name of law and order and constituents.
Rajendra K. Gupta Hello my dear Sir-
I totally get where you're coming from, and it's a valid point to consider. In many cases, it does seem like armies are used more to protect political interests than to serve the everyday needs of citizens. History has shown us time and again that military power can be wielded to maintain political control, rather than to defend borders or ensure the well-being of the people. In countries like Russia, the U.S., India, and Pakistan, we often see military actions that align with political agendas, not necessarily with the welfare of the general population.
It’s also true that the wealthy, including politicians, often live in luxury, while the majority of people struggle. The gap between the elites and the average citizen can feel overwhelming, especially when the average person is paying taxes and living under laws that don't always seem to benefit them.
That being said, while it's disappointing to see this reality, it’s important for people to recognize these patterns and keep pushing for reforms that prioritize fairness, accountability, and real security for the general public.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Political Science