In physics, normally a critical information solves many seemingly unrelated problems at the same time. I think this is the case with the information that neutrinos are magnetic monopoles of tachyonic nature in the universe does. It fulfills the symmetry of Maxwell's equation first. The question of where are all the magnetic monopoles in the universe is answered. It solves why and how light propagates in the absolute vacuum because waves need a medium to propagate. After all, it also turned out that neutrinos are the key players in the mystery of quantum mechanical uncertainty in the universe as well. The magnetic monopole neutrinos of tachyonic nature is all it takes. The solid experimental proof is in the measurement of the neutron's magnetic monopole charge by experiment.
It seems that the inertial mass of the electron can be explained by tachyonic magnetic monopole neutrinos.
What would be the defect of this investigative conclusion other than it doesn't explain the mass of the proton which has never been found to decay?
Neutrinos and electrons are in the same category of elementary particles. One is magnetic monopole and the other is electric monopole. One has real mass and the other has imaginary "numbered" mass. They are both abundant about the same scale of numbers in the universe.
The main problem is there doesn't seem to be enough opposite magnetic monopole as many as the north pole type in this universe contrary to positive and negative electric charge of electrons and protons. What is going on?
If proton doesn't decay at all, how Big Bang theory can be a correct theory? Deficiency of antimatter in the universe is not a glitch of Big Bang theory, it is a fundamental stumbling block.
It shakes the root principle of Big Bang theory.
The matter-antimatter universe must have been created at the same time of the real big bang and they went out separate ways in time. But then it is not the big bang theory every body knows what it is.
Dear Eue Jin Jeong
Our Universe with billions of galaxies where each galaxy is carrying billions solar system is not result of unscientific Big Bang theory. Nothing is working mechanically as last century scientists stated. Einstein, Maxwell, Planks and all others, they thought whole universe is one galaxy universe, and they thought also whole universe is our small solar system. Everything they said, it is not even working with our solar system.
If we are smart, and our DNA is smart, because it is holding all our information, than ATOM IS SMART.
We must ask ourselves where all the mass of universe is coming from? What character Space of universe is holding inside of an atom and outside of atom? Why all the planets are sphere ? why an atom is holding same shape of sphere?
Neutrinos decay to create proton/neutron or electron is a mechanical phenomenon. it is never been observed, and it is not science to follow.
Article How the Quantum Universe Works
best wishes.
Eue Jin Jeong
The neutrino is not a mono pole but a dipole: It is a torus structure where the symmetry axis is directed parallel with the velocity vector. It has a mass, but it doesn't follow the mass law E=mc^2
JES
Dear Stellan Gustafsson
Does Doan theory apply to billions of galaxies ?
Regards.
Dear Eue,
It is true that all waves need a medium to propagate.
Here you have how light propagates in a vacuum, the medium used and how to obtain the wave equation in that medium (chapter 2.6), you can also obtain the mass-energy relationship (chapter 2.5):
Preprint ALL SPECIAL RELATIVITY EQUATIONS OBTAINED USING GALILEAN TRA...
And also the energy of the photon:
Preprint ENERGIA FOTÓN, APROXIMACIÓN GRAVEDAD UNIVERSAL DE NEWTON Y L...
Dear E. J Jeong,
I had a look on your paper related to your question (Measurement of Neutrino's Magnetic Monopole Charge).
There are incorrect formula and s incorrect assertations in that paper.
I am using the standard geometric units for QFT where em-constants and C ~ h ~ L^0 (dimensionless): Mass ~ momentum ~ em-vectorpotential A_mu ~ 1/L, em-field strength-tensor ~ 1/L^2, etc.
1. The formula (7) for Magnetic B is dimensionally incorrect. then it must be as above mentioned as an antisymmetric second rank tensor of dimension 1/L^2! So the r in its numerator is to much!
2. Accordingly your assertions: page 3 "Because of the symmetry in the theory of electricity and magnetism between electric and magnetic phenomenon, traveling magnetic monopole can create spiraling electric field along its path just like traveling electron creates spiraling magnetic field along its path." - (it can not, because of non symmetry among E and B) - and also in conclusion "3. Fulfillment of the symmetry in Maxwell's theory between electricity and magnetism" are in view of non symmetry between E and B tensors incorrect.
There is no symmetry between electricity and magnetism only when neutrons are not considered having magnetic monopole charges. Now after experimentally identifying the single magnetic monopole charge, symmetry can be claimed and it can be used to derive electric filed created by traveling magnetic monopoles. Experiment proceed theory.
The most remarkable beauty of this result is that quantum mechanical mystery of uncertainty is solved. And the additional by product is that it explains the missing medium for light propagation in the empty space. Also it explains why the universe expands fast as observed. The other beauty is electron and neutrino pairs each other in their numbers and sharing charges of different kind side by side fulfilling the long sought symmetry in the theory of electricity and magnetism. I would say it's similar to catching five birds with one stone. I think that this is an example of the real beauty of having correct perception of the universe. God doesn't play dice but he/she can make the universe look like being operated by randomeness.
The related paper for this question is simply wrong!
Please be concrete and write no literature about subjective thing liker God and beauty in scientific models.
The B field strength has wrong dimension in your paper! and this has nothing to do neither with physics and nor Maxwell theory. You understood the experiment not correct. It CAN Not BE ANY ANTISYMMETRIC SECOND RANK TENSOR WITH 1/L GEOMETRIC DIMENSION IN THE QFT STANDARD GEOMETRIC UNITS!
YOUR MODEL IS BASICALLY WRONG!
Farhad Ghaboussi ,
Dimensions are taken care of by permittivity and permeability in Maxwell's equation.
Has it ever occurred it to you that QFT may not be complete? It's full of infinities you have to subtract in each step of the calculation.
From mathematicians' point of view, it is a pure nonsense. I know such calculation result fits to highest degree of accuracy. But you can tell it still lacks something.
The concept of electric field created by time varying(moving) magnetic field is employed in the simple working principle of typical electrical transformers we use every day. The organized collimated beam of magnetic monopole neutrinos in space is basically the magnetic flux. The reason we don't have magnetic field in free space is because these magnetic monopole neutrino flux is isotropic and homogeneous.
It's a simple extension that doesn't need complicated explanation. In the new version of the paper, it shows how Maxwell's equation becomes fully symmetric.
And it explains why there exist measurable physical quantities like permittivity and permeability in the presumably absolute empty space and why the Universe expands fast if you consider the physical universe prefers going to lower energy state.
The most recent version of the paper is uploaded. It's more of a step by step version of the original paper (titled: Magnetic Monopole Neutrinos in the Universe).
I had to revise the paper because I didn't want to sound like too authoritative making statements without giving accurate mathematical reasoning.
What struck me the most while writing the paper is that the total randomness in the motion of tachyonic magnetic monopole neutrinos in space creates the amazing orders in the structure of matters, galactic and planetary motions and biological structures, which I call the "Order out of Chaos".
Sounds familiar? It is a Masonic doctrine. I'm not a Mason by the way.
By the way, catching five birds with one stone in physics is called "Occam's razor". Nature takes the simplest and shortest path ways for its construct.
E. J. Jeong,
permittivity and permeability are in standard. QFT geometric unites dimensionless constants. Your related paper is incorrect. There is no way to consider the antisymmetric tensor B as 1/L dimensional. It MUST be considered always as 1/L.L in QFT standard unites!
Farhad Ghaboussi,
At the time of the creation of QFT, the then existing electrodynamics was not symmetric with respect to magnetism and electrcity.
So you can't expect QED could be a complete theory because it reflected nonsymmetric Maxwell’s equation. It is not a coincidence that the Weak-Interaction in elementary particle physics seems to be a result of this missed magnetic monopole in Maxwell’s theory which is extremely weak by itself.
It means huge overhaul of many existing physics theories is expected in the future.
I'm pretty sure gravity can be explained as a density effect of these tachyonic magnetic monopole neutrinos while electroweak theory is a polarization effect of the same medium.
The only mystery is how these particles can possibly cause SU(3) symmetry of the strong nuclear force if at all.
This problem could be a long shot.
I believe it's a path to the conceptual unification of all four existing fundamental forces in nature.
E. J. Jeong,
It is the QFT including QED!
Both obey the dimensional structure of geometric unites! This is standard for QFT including QED.
Any antisymmetric second rank tensor, e. g. of field strength such as E and B fields in QED must be of dimension 1/L.L !
Your construction with 1/L dimensional B is WRONG!
No serious physicist accept such a construction. What you did is contradictory metaphysics!
It seems that you have no idea of the standard unites in QFT of em-interactions (QED).
Don't change the discussion about other aspects.
End of discussion for me. I can not discuss in this level more with you about your violation of facts.
Farhad Ghaboussi,
Known QED doesn't have a solution for magnetic monopole. It lacks proper tools to say anything about magnetic monopole solution. The magnetic monopole phenomenon is outside the realm of the existing QFT.
For another similar example, the known general relativity concluded long time ago that there is no dipole gravity.
And when you show rotating hemisphere does have relativistic shift of the center of mass when rotating that legitimize dipole gravity and they say there is no dipole gravity so there can not be legitimate shift of center of mass other than the meaningless coordinate translation.
It's called tautology. People need to wake up.
You can not test the depth of a new physics with old faulty stick. It won't work. It only hinders the progress of science.
For the last time,
it doesn't matter. The standard of dimensions of E and B in ANY CASE in geometric unites remains the same.
It is not your or others private property!
Your results in your paper are physically, mathematically and logically are wrong!
End of discussion.
How can you calculate or evaluate for something that is unanimously claimed it doesn't exist in your theory?
Its a nonsense.
Newtonian mechanics can not talk or even contemplate about bending of light near gravity for a simple example. There is no such thing as bending of light in Newtonian gravity.
It's called out stretch that is beyond the scope of the original theory.
Keep on this discussion. I think it's very interesting. Don't try to run away.
What you think and write are non sense. Your arguments are worth than non sense. I wrote, that I have no interest on discussion with you!
The dimensional standards of geometric units for QFT/QED are for any reasonable theory! They can be ignored only in non sense like your model.
End of discussion. I will not answer your non sense.
Farhad Ghaboussi
QFT/QED that you are talking about doesn't have a magnetic monopole solution in it. That means you don't know what you are talking about.
Dimension is always taken care of by the constants. I find no contradictions in the constants either from Maxwell's equations point of view.
New QFT/QED will have to be developed by incorporating magnetic monopole in the future. As I pointed out before, the known QFT/QED is not complete.
You even claimed moving magnetic charge doesn't create electric field around it that you immediately become mute after I pointed out the electrical transformer example, which shows your lack of understanding of the basic general physics.
If a traveling magnetic monopole neutrino can create electric field around it like a traveling electron creates magnetic field, which is the whole point of the paper, the entire argument in my paper is valid.
Other than that, the experimental detection of the magnetic monopole of individual neutron by itself is a irrefutable evidence.
Try to show legitimate mathematical or experimental evidence before claiming something you have no idea about.
Disprove the nonsense of possibility of different r-dependencies for E and B fields in case of magnetic monopole.
By assumption is this hypothetical particle a result of "quantization" of electric and magnetic charge of Maxwell model.
The only reasonable quantization of this model is known to be QED via QFT.
At any rate the Maxwell model must be confirmed for any submodel of magnetic monopole.
Maxwell's equations are valid only if both E and B field strengths have the same dimensions, i.e. 1/L2 in geometric unites, in other words their r-dependencies are of the same order.
Therefore any "model" to construct magnetic monopole via Maxwell model with E and B fields with different r-dependencies is absolute nonsense.
Farhad Ghaboussi
r^ in the electric field created by moving magnetic charge is a directional unit vector not full r- vector. Check it out carefully. Maxwell's equation is completely symmetric on Jm (magnetic current) and Je (electric current). You can not tell the difference.
There is no formal difference at all between the two.
If it is so, then it is OK. r^ must have geometric dimension L^0 = 1! Although the necessary correct dimensional relations don't say anything about the quality of results of paper.
Obviously any relation must obey QFT/QED dimensional standards in geometric units. Other was it is wrong. This has nothing to do with magnetic monopole in or outsides of QFT! It is general and absolut.
Farhad Ghaboussi
Try to find QFT/QED that has magnetic monopole solution in it. You may win a Nobel physics prize with that. It will turn everything upside down. Electroweak theory may turn out to be just QED with magnetic monopole solution in it. Who would have guessed the symmetric form of Maxwell's equation can explain quantum mechanical uncertainty, medium for light propagation, dark energy and where-about of magnetic monopoles in the universe to just name a few.
your level of thinking is very low and you should leran what magnetic monoüle is. Quantization of electric chrage results in quantization of magnetic charge called monople.
You are not able to understan QFT, QED. Learn physics before writing nonsense.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Physical Sciences
- Quantum Physics
- Quantum Mechanics