I am aware that Prof Subramanian Chandrasekar did considerable work on eqilibrium configuration of bodies (including rotating) under gravitational potential. Has this / Could this been applied to the Strong Nuclear Force which is also attractive though of a different form (and scale) and the attractive EM force (possibly repulsion could be handled by symmetry ??) ? Could this have connections to Quantum Gravity / Solitons / Self-focusing under a combination of forces etc ?
One helpful fact is that all forces are typically functions of the radial distance and hence radially symmetric
Dear Sundaram, I believe universe is a Quantum mechanics phenomenon, therefore the Gravity is a QM as well. I am going to introduce this remark in 2019 Quantum Physics as plenary speaker in France (3 weeks).
Article Quantum Mechanics Gravity, Mechanical Gravity of Newton is Myth
best regard. Javad
- As far as my understanding goes quantum mechanics is nothing but Fourier Analysis plus some tricks to remove the infinities. As a result I think your (@Sundaram) main spirit is ok. However one needs to be careful about some names of subjects. There is a mess in the language used in Theoretical Phys today as clear from some discussions on the perceived connection of supergravity and positive mass theorem regarding the recent breakthrough prize. It is a challenge to write physics without misusing the word quantum or other high sounding words. Otherwise the problems you cited are on solutions of PDE's only. Essentially the present situation is due to lack of interdisciplinary studies. People who are experts on PDE are usually not much exposed to quantization and vice versa. So two representations of the reality are developing in parallel although one has serious problems with infinities.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Force