24 November 2016 2 9K Report

hi im a new researcher and is hoping for some opinion on this.

i am working on podocytes cells, which are part of the glomerulus of kidney. They are therefore exposed to glomerular pressure, and as such mechanical stress especially in glomerular hypertension. I would like to study the adaptation of these cells to mechanical stress and what i have in my institute is an apparatus that can stretch the cells. But the stretching paramaters involved slightly differs from what other researchers in published papers do. For instance, biaxial stretching is done but my apparatus can only stretch in 1 plane (uniaxial). Also, my apparatus applies continuous stretch but other researches use apparatus that can apply cyclic stretch (stretch and relaxation cycle). I believe the apparatus used by other researchers would better mimic the conditions in the kidney.

How then do i justify using this apparatus to study global phosphoproteomic response using mass spec? At the end of this 4 years (phd), will i get shoot down for using a simpler system?

or maybe i was thinking of looking at markers associated with mechanically stressed cells. If i see similar responses, can i better argue that indeed yes eventhough the apparatus is inferior in ways, it is still able to replicate mechanical stress in cells?

More Jeff Zaki's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions